Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 499/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:II.DOR.499.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request as statutory conditions for review are not met.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 499/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the mother's request to permit a review of the lower court's custody decision. The mother argued the second-instance judgment lacked proper reasoning, but the court found no grounds to allow the appeal. Consequently, the Supreme Court declined to examine the merits of the custody dispute or the adequacy of the lower court's explanation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled, and the Supreme Court must reject the request without examining the substantive merits.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal custody dispute review conditions Supreme Court procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
324 ZPP
AI generated
Sodba I Up 338/2002
Appeal dismissed; temporary custody order for child from broken cohabitation requires irrefutable necessity.
VSM sklep III Cp 902/2011
Appeal dismissed: interim order on child custody requires proven irreparable harm, not just pending criminal investigation.
VSL sodba IV Cp 1604/2012
Appeal partially allowed; child support adjusted based on parents' actual financial capacities and custody responsibilities.
VSL sklep IV Cp 4263/2005
Appeal allowed; family court failed to investigate child endangerment claims, violating best interests principle.
Sklep II Ips 236/2012
Supreme Court rejects appeal on child protection and alimony separately due to distinct legal issues and insufficient value thresholds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog za dopustitev revizije se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik (oče) je zahteval predodelitev mladoletnih otrok od toženke (matere otrok) k sebi, posledično pa ureditev stikov in plačevanje preživnine. V postopku je bilo ugotovljeno, da je postopek odtujitve zaključen; deklici sta očetu odtujeni, ga zavračata, zato ni možnosti za predodelitev.

2. Sodišče prve stopnje je tožbeni zahtevek za predodelitev zavrnilno. Je pa nekoliko spremenilo dosedanji režim stikov, in sicer tako, da se stiki deklic z očetom ne izvajajo pod nadzorom CSD.

3. Sodišče druge stopnje je obe pritožbi zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

4. Toženka v zvezi z odločitvijo o stikih vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije in predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče dopusti vprašanje: 1. Ali je odločba sodišča druge stopnje ustrezno obrazložena?

5. Predlog ni utemeljen.

6. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče tožničin predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

7. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).