Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 1304/2021 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2021:II.CP.1304.2021 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the appellant lacks procedural capacity due to partial loss of business capacity.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 1304/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court declared the appellant's appeal of no legal effect, ruling that the appeal cannot be considered or decided. The appellant, who had partially lost business capacity regarding court and administrative proceedings, filed the appeal personally without a guardian or attorney. Consequently, the court held that the appellant lacks procedural capacity under Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Act, rendering the appeal inadmissible and non-binding.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Act; A party who has lost business capacity for court proceedings lacks procedural capacity and cannot perform procedural acts personally, rendering such acts legally ineffective.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural capacity business capacity Civil Procedure Act inadmissible appeal guardian authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sklep III Ip 866/2015
Court partially allows appeal to defer court fee payment due to blocked bank accounts for legal entity.
VSL sklep I Cp 2081/2016
Appeal court grants fee waiver to plaintiff receiving social assistance under ZST-1 Article 11.1.
VSL Sklep II Ip 208/2020
Appeal dismissed; family income determines tax waiver eligibility, not individual net pay or debts.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 489/2020
Appeal dismissed; court fee exemption requires current assets, not hypothetical future third-party impact.
VSL sklep II Cpg 514/2000
Court allows tax exemption appeal, overturning first instance rejection due to insufficient notice of missing income documents.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da pritožba z dne 13. 8. 2021 nima pravnih učinkov.

[JEDRO]

Predlagatelj nima procesne sposobnosti, zato predlagateljeve pritožbe ni mogoče obravnavati in o njej odločiti. Predlagateljeva vloga je brez vsakih pravnih učinkov in kot takšna neupoštevna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom zavrglo predlagateljev predlog za oprostitev plačila sodnih taks z dne 30. 6. 2021.

2. Zoper navedeni sklep je predlagatelj vložil pritožbo sam.

3. Pritožba nima pravnih učinkov.

4. Predlagatelju je bila delno odvzeta poslovna sposobnost, in sicer za vse aktivnosti, povezane s sodnimi, upravnimi in drugimi uradnimi postopki. Predlagatelj zato nima procesne sposobnosti (niti) v tem postopku (prvi odstavek 77. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku). Procesno dejanje, ki ga je predlagatelj opravil sam (vložitev pritožbe z dne 13. 8. 2021) se zato ne upošteva. Predlagateljeve pritožbe zato ni mogoče obravnavati in o njej odločiti. Predlagateljeva vloga je zato brez vsakih pravnih učinkov in kot takšna neupoštevna.

5. Predlagatelj ima skrbnico (in pooblaščenko), ki je (sta) zanj upravičena(i) opravljati procesna dejanja v sodnem postopku, teh dejanj pa predlagatelj, kot že rečeno, ne more opravljati sam. Vložitev omenjene predlagateljeve pritožbe kot procesno dejanje zato ne more imeti nobenih pravnih posledic.

6. Ker je predlagateljeva pritožba neupoštevna, je pritožbeno sodišče zato o tem pravnem dejstvu izdalo ugotovitveni sklep.