Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 378/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:II.DOR.378.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statute of limitations for foreign alimony does not break limitation period.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 378/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the lower court's decision. The first-instance court had declared the debtor's objection to enforcement based on the statute of limitations valid, effectively stopping the enforcement of a foreign alimony judgment. The Supreme Court agreed that the review application was inadmissible because the conditions for review under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met. Consequently, the court confirmed the lower court's ruling that the limitation period remains intact despite the foreign enforcement request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 367.a člen; 367.c člen 2. člen: A request for review is inadmissible when the conditions for review are not met, specifically where the Supreme Court finds that the lower court's decision on the statute of limitations regarding foreign alimony enforcement was correct and no new legal issue justifies the review.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations foreign alimony enforcement review application Code of Civil Procedure enforcement stop limitation period review inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
367.c člen 2. odstavek Zakona o pravdnem postopku
324. člen 7. odstavek Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cp 1191/2011
Court rejects appeal; management fees for apartment buildings expire in one year under Obligations Act.
VSL sodba II Cpg 1244/2016
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on vehicle damage compensation calculation in small value disputes.
VSL sodba I Cp 616/2000
Appeal dismissed; contract termination ended management duties, barring unjust enrichment claims for June 1997 expenses.
VSL sodba I Cp 1859/2012
Spousal joint debt liability requires proof of common purpose, not merely marital relationship at loan time.
VSM sodba I Cp 1455/2013
Appeal dismissed; tenant's appeal against eviction order upheld as contract termination was invalid.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugovoru dolžnika zoper sklep o izvršbi z dne 11. 9. 2018 ugodilo in sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Tolminu I 71/2018 z dne 3. 9. 2018 razveljavilo, zavrnilo izvršilni predlog in ustavilo izvršbo. Presodilo je, da je dolžnikov ugovor zastaranja utemeljen.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo upnice zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje upnica vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije in predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče dopusti revizijo glede vprašanja: »Ali vložitev zahteve za izterjavo preživnine iz tujine pomeni pretrganje zastaranja?«

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog upnice zavrnilo.

6. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).