Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VDSS Sklep Pdp 411/2021 ECLI:SI:VDSS:2021:PDP.411.2021 AI generated

Appeal against a ruling dismissing an incomplete appeal is rejected as procedurally inadmissible under Slovenian law.

Case Number VDSS Sklep Pdp 411/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Second Instance Court dismissed the appellant's complaint against the First Instance Court's decision to reject an incomplete appeal. The appellant argued that the rejection violated constitutional rights, but the court found no legal basis for appealing a ruling that itself dismissed an incomplete submission. Consequently, the court confirmed the lower court's decision because the procedural law does not provide for an appeal against such a specific ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

343. člen ZPP; 350. člen ZPP: An appeal against a court's decision to reject an incomplete appeal is inadmissible as such a remedy is not foreseen in the procedural legislation.

Keywords

AI generated
incomplete appeal procedural inadmissibility appeal against rejection ZPP procedural law dismissal of complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
343. člen ZPP
Sodišče prve stopnje je tožnikovo pritožbo zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča (s katerim je potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje o zavrženju pritožbe kot nepopolne) pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (343. člen ZPP), saj pritožba zoper tovrstni sklep pritožbenega sodišča v procesni zakonodaji ni predvidena.
350. člen ZPP
365. člen ZPP
366. člen ZPP
AI generated
VDS sklep Psp 540/2006
Appeal against final social court ruling dismissed as no legal remedy exists for final decisions.
VSL sklep II Cp 1967/2016
Appeal dismissed because the first-instance court correctly rejected the appeal against the higher court's decision as inadmissible.
VDSS Sklep Psp 58/2021
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff barred from filing appeal without lawyer license, violating no public trial claim.
VDSS Sklep Pdp 597/2021
Appeal against a procedural ruling on standing is dismissed as an inadmissible procedural act under ZPP. The court rejected the appeal because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law. The appeal was deemed inadmissible because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law. The appeal was rejected because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law.
VSC Sklep I Cp 27/2021
Appeal against a second-instance court's decision to reject a plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as legally inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Sodišče prve stopnje je tožnikovo pritožbo zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča (s katerim je potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje o zavrženju pritožbe kot nepopolne) pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (343. člen ZPP), saj pritožba zoper tovrstni sklep pritožbenega sodišča v procesni zakonodaji ni predvidena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom zavrglo pritožbo zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča Pdp 230/2021 z dne 20. 5. 2021.

2. Tožnik zoper navedeni sklep vlaga pritožbo, v kateri se sklicuje na Ustavo RS in Splošno deklaracijo o človekovih pravicah.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Pritožbeno sodišče je na podlagi drugega odstavka 350. člena v zvezi s 366. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nasl.) izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje preizkusilo v okviru pritožbenih navedb in razlogov, na katere pazi po uradni dolžnosti.

5. Sodišče prve stopnje je tožnikovo pritožbo zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča (s katerim je potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje o zavrženju pritožbe kot nepopolne) pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (343. člen ZPP), saj pritožba zoper tovrstni sklep pritožbenega sodišča v procesni zakonodaji ni predvidena.

6. Zato je pritožbeno sodišče tožnikovo pritožbo zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno in izpodbijani sklep potrdilo (2. točka 365. člena ZPP).