Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 84/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:III.DOR.84.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to determine if bankruptcy administrator's actions trigger state liability under Article 26 of the Constitution.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 84/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the review of the second-instance decision regarding a claim for damages against the state. The plaintiff argued that the bankruptcy administrator, acting as a public authority, caused damage through unlawful conduct, invoking Article 26 of the Constitution for state liability. The court found that the conditions for allowing the review were met based on the specific legal question posed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 26 of the Constitution; Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure: The Supreme Court may permit a review when a specific question arises regarding whether a provision of the Constitution establishes state liability for damages caused by a bankruptcy administrator acting as a holder of public authority.

Keywords

AI generated
state liability bankruptcy administrator public authority Constitutional review unlawful conduct damages claim civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 26 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia
Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sodba III Ips 33/2021
Supreme Court rejects state liability for insolvency administrator's torts under Article 26 of the Constitution.
Sodba III Ips 19/2009
Court dismisses appeal claiming contract modification caused damages due to pressure and unequal bargaining power.
Sodba III Ips 182/2008
Supreme Court dismisses review rejecting employer's claim for reimbursement of disability allowance due to lower pay at new job.
Sklep III DoR 24/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal on lease termination and unjust enrichment conditions in Slovenian civil procedure.
Sklep in sodba III Ips 93/2007
Appeal partially allowed; court voids lower court judgment on interest payment due to procedural error regarding witness testimony.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je treba določbo 26. člena Ustave RS tudi v tej konkretni zadevi razlagati tako, da določa odgovornost države za škodo, ki jo v zvezi z opravljanjem službe oziroma dejavnosti s svojim protipravnim ravnanjem povzroči stečajni upravitelj kot nosilec javnih pooblastil?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali je treba določbo 26. člena URS tudi v tej konkretni zadevi razlagati tako, da določa odgovornost države za škodo, ki jo v zvezi z opravljanjem službe oziroma dejavnosti s svojim protipravnim ravnanjem povzroči stečajni upravitelj kot nosilec javnih pooblastil.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo, s katero je to sodišče zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 76.039,87 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 24. 9. 2003 naprej.

2. Zoper odločbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).