Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 1312/2020 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2021:II.CP.1312.2020 AI generated

Appeal court dismisses request for correction of judgment as errors are not clerical or formal defects.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 1312/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court rejected the plaintiff's request to correct the lower court's judgment dated December 15, 2020. The plaintiff argued that the decision on costs was inconsistent with free legal aid guidelines, but the court found no clerical errors or formal discrepancies. Consequently, the court ruled that the alleged issues did not meet the statutory criteria for a correction order.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

1. odstavek 328. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Correction of judgments is limited to clerical errors, calculation mistakes, and formal inconsistencies, excluding substantive disagreements on legal interpretation or application.

Keywords

AI generated
correction of judgment clerical errors ZPP 328 formal defects costs allocation legal aid appeal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
1. odstavek 328. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VDSS Sklep Psp 182/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld correction of first-instance ruling regarding legal aid fee allocation.
VSL sklep I Cp 3351/2010
Appeal dismissed for lack of interest; procedural error regarding costs ruling is not fatal to appeal.
VSL sklep II Cp 1863/2013
Court partially allowed appeal correcting lawyer fees for multiple clients, reducing total award by 132.88 EUR.
UPRS sklep II U 359/2015
Administrative court rejects motion to reopen proceedings as original judgment was based on procedural errors, not new facts.
UPRS Sodba I U 852/2017-11
Administrative court dismisses appeal against rejection of fee waiver, ruling fee relief requires separate court procedure under fee law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog za izdajo popravnega sklepa se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Okoliščine, ki jih v predlogu izpostavlja tožnik, niso posledica napake v imenih in številkah, očitne pisne ali računske pomote, in ne predstavljajo pomanjkljivosti glede oblike in neskladnosti prepisa sodbe z izvirnikom.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožeča stranka je 11. 3. 2021 vložila predlog za popravo sodbe tega sodišča s 15. 12. 2020. Zavzema se za to, da pritožbeno sodišče odločitev o stroških uskladi z odločitvami Službe za brezplačno pravno pomoč okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani.

2. V skladu s 1. odstavkom 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) lahko predsednik senata kadar koli popravi napake v imenih in številkah ter druge očitne pisne in računske pomote, pomanjkljivosti glede oblike in neskladnosti prepisa sodbe z izvirnikom. Okoliščine, ki jih v predlogu izpostavlja tožnik, niso posledica napake v imenih in številkah, očitne pisne ali računske pomote, ne predstavljajo pomanjkljivosti glede oblike in neskladnosti prepisa sodbe z izvirnikom, zato ne utemeljujejo izdaje popravnega sklepa.

3. Neutemeljen predlog je višje sodišče zavrnilo.