Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 55/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:III.DOR.55.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding interpretation of mandatory public health service payment clauses under specific circumstances.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 55/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the second-instance court's decision on a medical service payment claim. The lower court partially awarded the plaintiff 3,779.28 EUR but rejected a higher claim, prompting the applicant to seek further review. The court determined that the conditions for review were met specifically to clarify the correct interpretation of the relevant statutory provision within these facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure; Review is permitted when the correct interpretation of a specific statutory provision regarding mandatory public health service payments is required to resolve the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
mandatory public service health service payment urgent service clause civil procedure review statutory interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)
Article 324(7) of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cp 864/2020
Appeal dismissed; court rejects separate assessment of success basis and amount for cost allocation.
VSL sodba I Cp 1058/2009
Court dismisses appeal claiming legal expenses are damages, ruling they are procedural costs under contract law.
VSL Sklep I Cp 277/2018
Appeal granted; lower court's default judgment against parents for child's torts dismissed due to lack of fault evidence.
VSL sodba I Cp 3185/2010
Appeal dismissed; court upheld award for mental distress caused by defamatory police report contents.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 543/2018
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to specify lump sum price for services, breaching burden of proof.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, kakšna je pravilna razlaga drugega odstavka 45. b člena Zakona o zdravniški službi (ZZdrS) v okoliščinah konkretnega primera?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, kakšna je pravilna razlaga drugega odstavka 45. b člena Zakona o zdravniški službi (ZZdrS) v okoliščinah konkretnega primera.

koncesijska pogodba - obvezna javna služba - zdravniška služba - urgentna služba - plačilo za opravljeno zdravstveno storitev

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi delno ugodilo in izpodbijano zavrnilno sodbo spremenilo tako, da je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku za plačilo 3.779,28 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 13. 9. 2019. Višji zahtevek (to je glede 8.492,08 EUR z obrestmi) pa je zavrnilo.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).