Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 57/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:III.DOR.57.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding interpretation of medical service law and procedural delay objection handling.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 57/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the review of the second-instance judgment on specific legal questions. The lower court partially granted the plaintiff's claim for 3,779.28 EUR but rejected a higher amount, prompting the defendant to request review. The court found that the conditions for review were met under the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the interpretation of the Medical Service Act and the handling of a statute of limitations objection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 45b paragraph 2 of the Medical Service Act: A review is admissible when the second-instance court fails to rule on a statute of limitations objection or when the correct interpretation of the Medical Service Act remains unclear in the specific circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure Medical Service Act statute of limitations review admissibility second instance judgment procedural delay civil litigation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 45b paragraph 2 of the Medical Service Act
Article 324 paragraph 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 100/2017
Supreme Court allows appeal review on copyright remuneration calculation regarding cable retransmission fees.
VSM sklep I Cpg 336/2016
Appeal allowed; court voided clause excluding liability for post-accident duty breaches under Obligations Act.
VSL sodba II Cpg 689/2015
Employer dismissed appeal; court upheld duty to sign reduced-hour contract but rejected claim for full-time sick pay costs.
VSC Sodba Cp 407/2020
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove state organ liability for tax authority's actions.
VSL sodba I Cpg 77/2015
Appeal dismissed; mere notice of contractual penalty claim without debtor liability for delay cannot serve as payment basis.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanj:

- kakšna je pravilna razlaga drugega odstavka 45.b člena Zakona o zdravniški službi (ZZdrS) v okoliščinah konkretnega primera in

- ali je sodišče druge stopnje storilo bistveno kršitev določb pravdnega postopka, ko se ni opredelilo do ugovora zastaranja?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanj:

- kakšna je pravilna razlaga drugega odstavka 45.b člena Zakona o zdravniški službi (ZZdrS) v okoliščinah konkretnega primera in

- ali je sodišče druge stopnje storilo bistveno kršitev določb pravdnega postopka, ko se ni opredelilo do ugovora zastaranja.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi delno ugodilo in izpodbijano zavrnilno sodbo spremenilo tako, da je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku za plačilo 3.779,28 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 13. 9. 2019. Višji zahtevek (to je glede 8.492,08 EUR z obrestmi) pa je zavrnilo.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanj, opredeljenih v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).