Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 19/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:III.DOR.19.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding conditions for default judgment based on oral agreement under ZPP 282.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 19/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia permitted the appeal regarding whether conditions for a default judgment based on the file status under Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act were met. The lower court rejected the claim for 23,651.65 EUR based on an alleged oral agreement, prompting the appellant to request leave for appeal. The court found that the specific question concerning the applicability of Article 282 ZPP satisfied the criteria for admitting the review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act: An appeal is admissible if the question concerns whether the conditions for issuing a judgment based on the file status are fulfilled in a specific case involving an oral agreement.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act default judgment file status oral agreement appeal admissibility Supreme Court review permitted

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 324(7) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 285/2016
Supreme Court allows review of first-instance judgment regarding Article 21 of the Constitution on personal rights in detention.
VSL Sodba I Cp 2046/2017
Appeal dismissed; tenant manager not liable for full rent on deceased co-owner's share due to prior agreement.
VSL sklep Cpg 547/93
Court allows appeal against dismissal of interest claim due to improper burden of proof application.
VSL Vmesna sodba in sklep I Cpg 700/2021
Insurance court rules alcohol exclusion applies only to policyholder, not employees driving the car. Partially allowed.
VDSS sodba Psp 574/2009
Appeal dismissed: A prior court ruling correcting an employer's decision does not automatically constitute unlawful conduct requiring damages.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: ali so v primeru, ko se v postopku dokazuje obstoj in vsebina ustnega dogovora med pravdnima strankama, na katerem temelji zahtevek tožeče stranke, v okoliščinah konkretnega primera izpolnjeni pogoji za izdajo sodbe na podlagi stanja spisa v skladu z 282. členom ZPP?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali so v primeru, ko se v postopku dokazuje obstoj in vsebina ustnega dogovora med pravdnima strankama, na katerem temelji zahtevek tožeče stranke, v okoliščinah konkretnega primera izpolnjeni pogoji za izdajo sodbe na podlagi stanja spisa v skladu z 282. členom ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo in potrdilo zavrnilno sodbo sodišča prve stopnje glede zahtevka v višini 23.651,65 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 19. 4. 2018.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).