Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep Dsp 1/2021-7 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:DSP.1.2021.7 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects its own ruling by replacing the wrong party name with the correct appellant in the introduction.

Case Number VSRS Sklep Dsp 1/2021-7
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia issued a corrective ruling to fix an obvious clerical error in its previous decision. The original text incorrectly identified the party filing the appeal as the plaintiff rather than the defendant. The court exercised its authority under the Code of Civil Procedure to amend the document and ensure the correct party is named.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

328. odstavek 1. ZPP; 332. ZPP: The Supreme Court may correct obvious errors in names and numbers or other clear written and arithmetic mistakes in its rulings, applying these provisions mutatis mutandis to judgments.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction Supreme Court ruling party identification mistake Code of Civil Procedure judgment amendment obvious mistake procedural rectification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
328. odstavek 1. ZPP
332. ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 2006/99
Court allows appeal dismissing default judgment due to unproven late court fee payment. The court found the plaintiff paid the fee after the deadline. The court ruled the fee payment was a procedural prerequisite for the case. The court reversed the dismissal and sent the case back for retrial.
VSL sklep Cpg 856/93
Appeal granted; first-instance judgment revoked due to lack of passive standing and procedural error.
Sklep I R 77/2007
Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request due to lack of obvious efficiency or impartiality concerns.
VSL Sklep VI Cpg 138/2026
Appeal dismissed; late court fee payment treated as withdrawal under ZPP Art. 105a(2).
UPRS Sklep I U 1207/2023-33
Administrative court appeal dismissed because lower court did not change the act or decide under Art. 66 ZUS-1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sklep Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije Dsp 1/2021 z dne 2. 3. 2021 se v uvodu popravi tako, da se besedna zveza: „o pritožbi tožeče stranke“ nadomesti z besedno zvezo: „o pritožbi tožene stranke“.

[JEDRO]

V uvodu sklepa Vrhovnega sodišča RS je prišlo do očitne pomote glede navedbe stranke, ki je vložila pritožbo zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje o razveljavitvi sodbe sodišča prve stopnje. Vrhovno sodišče RS je to očitno pomoto odpravilo s sklepom, izdanim na podlagi prvega odstavka 328. člena ZPP v zvezi z 332. členom ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. V uvodu sklepa Vrhovnega sodišča RS Dsp 1/2021 z dne 2. 3. 2021 je prišlo do očitne pomote glede navedbe stranke, ki je vložila pritožbo zoper sklep Višjega delovnega in socialnega sodišča Pdp 523/2020 z dne 27. 10. 2020. Zato je tožena stranka po izdaji sklepa Vrhovnega sodišča RS predlagala njegovo popravo, saj je Vrhovno sodišče RS s citiranim sklepom odločalo o pritožbi tožene stranke in ne tožeče stranke.

2. Po določbi prvega odstavka 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nadalj.; ZPP) lahko predsednik senata kadarkoli popravi napake v imenih in številkah ter druge očitne pisne in računske pomote, pomanjkljivosti glede oblike in neskladnost prepisa sodbe z izvirnikom. Glede na 332. člen ZPP velja določba 328. člena ZPP smiselno tudi za sklep. Na podlagi navedenih določb je Vrhovno sodišče RS s tem popravnim sklepom odpravilo očitno pomoto v uvodu sklepa Dsp 1/2021.