Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 627/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:II.DOR.627.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 627/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant argued for legal certainty and uniform application of law, but the court found the statutory conditions under Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied. Consequently, the review application was inadmissible, and the lower court's decision regarding damages remained final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is admissible only if it can be expected to decide on a legal issue important for legal certainty, uniform application of law, or legal development, otherwise it is dismissed.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure review application admissibility conditions legal certainty uniform application of law second instance judgment damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367.c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS sodba II Ips 165/2014
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on non-property damage compensation, upholding lower court's assessment of pain and suffering.
VSL Sodba I Cp 789/2019
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove stolen items, so court awarded only defendant's valuation.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1173/2018
Court partially allows appeal for mental distress damages and adjusts repair cost damages based on appeal success rate.
Sodba II Ips 946/2006
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on non-property damage compensation, upholding lower court's assessment of pain and suffering.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 864/2017
Appeal dismissed; employer's cumulative workplace conduct constitutes mobbing under ZDR Art. 6a requiring damages.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Pogoji iz 367.a člena ZPP za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo, da je dolžna tožeči stranki plačati odškodnino za nepremoženjsko škodo v višini 9.802 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. V presežku je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo in odločilo o stroških postopka.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožeča stranka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče dopusti revizijo, če je od njegove odločitve mogoče pričakovati odločitev o pravnem vprašanju, pomembnem za zagotovitev pravne varnosti, enotne uporabe prava ali za razvoj prava preko sodne prakse (prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP). 1 Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da navedeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso podani, zato je predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP). Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).

1 Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 s spremembami in dopolnitvami.