Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSL Sklep I Cp 153/2021 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2021:I.CP.153.2021 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the appellant lacked standing as the defendant's partner without proof of authorization.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 153/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the appeal lodged by M. A. against a first-instance judgment ordering the defendant to pay interest and costs. Although the appellant claimed to be the defendant's partner, he failed to demonstrate any authorization to act on her behalf or establish a legal right to appeal. Consequently, the appellate court dismissed the appeal under Article 346(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law for lack of standing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 346(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law; An appeal is inadmissible if lodged by a person who lacks the right to do so, such as a partner without proof of authorization to represent the party.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of standing civil procedure law partner representation authorization required inadmissible appeal civil procedure party rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 346(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pritožba ni dovoljena, ker jo je vložila oseba, ki nima te pravice.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da mora toženka tožnici plačati 86,15 EUR za obrestmi in stroški.

2. Zoper sodbo je vložil pritožbo M. A., ki je navedel, da jo vlaga za toženko kot njen partner.

3. Pritožba ni dovoljena, ker jo je vložila oseba, ki nima te pravice. Pritožnik se kot toženkin partner ne more pritožiti za toženko, ni pa niti navedel niti izkazal, da bi ga toženka pooblastila za zastopanje.

4. Pritožbeno sodišče je na podlagi prvega odstavka 346. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku pritožbo zato zavrglo.