Appeal dismissed because the appellant lacked standing as the defendant's partner without proof of authorization.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court rejected the appeal lodged by M. A. against a first-instance judgment ordering the defendant to pay interest and costs. Although the appellant claimed to be the defendant's partner, he failed to demonstrate any authorization to act on her behalf or establish a legal right to appeal. Consequently, the appellate court dismissed the appeal under Article 346(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law for lack of standing.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 346(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law; An appeal is inadmissible if lodged by a person who lacks the right to do so, such as a partner without proof of authorization to represent the party.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Pritožba se zavrže.
[JEDRO]
Pritožba ni dovoljena, ker jo je vložila oseba, ki nima te pravice.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da mora toženka tožnici plačati 86,15 EUR za obrestmi in stroški.
2. Zoper sodbo je vložil pritožbo M. A., ki je navedel, da jo vlaga za toženko kot njen partner.
3. Pritožba ni dovoljena, ker jo je vložila oseba, ki nima te pravice. Pritožnik se kot toženkin partner ne more pritožiti za toženko, ni pa niti navedel niti izkazal, da bi ga toženka pooblastila za zastopanje.
4. Pritožbeno sodišče je na podlagi prvega odstavka 346. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku pritožbo zato zavrglo.