Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 1601/2020 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2020:II.CP.1601.2020 AI generated

Appeal against second-instance court's dismissal of appeal is rejected as procedurally inadmissible under ZPP. Appeal requires revocation of first-instance judgment.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 1601/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the second-instance court's decision to reject the initial appeal. The appellant argued they could not pay court fees they did not benefit from, but the appeal was procedurally invalid. The court ruled that an appeal against a second-instance decision is only permissible if that decision revokes the first-instance judgment and remands the case, which did not occur here.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

375.a člen ZPP; 2. točka 365. člen ZPP: An appeal against a decision of a court of the second instance is admissible only if that decision sets aside the judgment of the court of the first instance and remands the case for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural admissibility second instance appeal remand for retrial court fees dispute ZPP procedural law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
375.a člen ZPP
Kot je pravilno navedlo sodišče prve stopnje, je zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje pritožba možna le v primeru, če sodišče druge stopnje razveljavi sodbo sodišča prve stopnje in vrne zadevo v ponovno sojenje (375.a člen ZPP), za kar pa v obravnavanem primeru ne gre.
2. točka 365. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 1113/2018
Appeal against final court deposit ruling dismissed due to lack of legal interest and identical content.
VSL sklep I Kp 1096/99
Appeal against second-instance judgment dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of statutory grounds under ZKP. The court rejected the appeal because the statute of limitations did not apply to the final judgment. The court ruled the appeal was inadmissible as it did not fall under the specific provision of the Criminal Procedure Act. The appeal was dismissed because the statute of limitations argument was irrelevant to the final judgment's validity. The court applied the correct legal interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding appeals. The decision confirms that appeals against final judgments require specific statutory grounds to be admissible.
VSC Sklep I Cp 216/2021
Appeal dismissed because the appeal against the first-instance court's dismissal of the appeal was itself inadmissible under ZPP.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2092/2017
Appeal against High Court ruling dismissed as inadmissible under procedural law rules.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 1173/2016
Appeal dismissed because final judgment precludes retrial or new judge under ZPP.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Kot je pravilno navedlo sodišče prve stopnje, je zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje pritožba možna le v primeru, če sodišče druge stopnje razveljavi sodbo sodišča prve stopnje in vrne zadevo v ponovno sojenje (375.a člen ZPP), za kar pa v obravnavanem primeru ne gre.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrglo pritožbo toženca zoper sklep Višjega sodišča v Ljubljani II Cp 33/2020 z dne 16. 1. 2020.

2. Proti navedenemu sklepu se je pravočasno pritožil toženec. V laični pritožbi navaja, da je bil ugovor oddan v roku 8 dni od prevzema v poštnem nabiralniku. Poudarja, da ne more plačati nekaj, česar ni koristil.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom z dne 23. 10. 2019 toženčevo pritožbo zoper sklep in sodbo z dne 21. 6. 2019 Okrajnega sodišča v Radovljici zaradi neplačila sodne takse, štelo za umaknjeno. Toženec se je zoper navedeni sklep pritožil. Njegovo pritožbo je Višje sodišče v Ljubljani s sklepom z dne 16. 1. 2020 kot prepozno zavrglo. Zoper navedeni sklep sodišča druge stopnje je toženec vložil pritožbo, ki jo je sodišče prve stopnje z izpodbijanim sklepom zavrglo.

5. Kot je pravilno navedlo sodišče prve stopnje, je zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje pritožba možna le v primeru, če sodišče druge stopnje razveljavi sodbo sodišča prve stopnje in vrne zadevo v ponovno sojenje (375.a člen ZPP), za kar pa v obravnavanem primeru ne gre.

6. Ker pritožba zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje, s katerim je bila pritožba zavržena, ni dovoljena, jo je sodišče prve stopnje pravilno zavrglo.

7. Glede na navedeno je pritožbeno sodišče pritožbo v skladu z 2. točko 365. člena ZPP zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.