Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 150/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:III.DOR.150.2020 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding jurisdiction objection by defendant who failed to file response to lawsuit.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 150/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the appeal to review whether a defendant who did not file a response to the lawsuit can raise a jurisdiction objection in their appeal against a default judgment. The first-instance court declared the lawsuit inadmissible due to lack of jurisdiction, and the second-instance court upheld this decision. The court ruled that the conditions for admitting the appeal are met specifically regarding this jurisdictional question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1; Appeals are admissible regarding jurisdictional objections raised by a defendant who failed to file a response to the lawsuit.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdiction objection default judgment failure to respond appeal admissibility civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1
Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 324. odst. 7
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cp 58/2002
Court dismisses appeal; unpaid tax claims against dissolved company's shareholders remain administrative, not civil.
VSL sklep I Cp 1003/99
Appeal dismissed; prior judgment binds spouse as unitary defendant in marital property disputes under ZPP/77.
Sklep II Ips 715/94
Appeal court quashes appeal decision due to procedural error regarding service of judgment to general power of attorney holder.
VSL sklep I Cp 560/2009
Appeal granted; first-instance court voided for ignoring final prior ruling on property ownership.
VSL sklep I Cp 4107/2008
Appeal granted; first instance court wrongly dismissed claim for failing to substantiate facts in attachments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali lahko tožena stranka, ki ne vloži odgovora na tožbo, v pritožbi zoper zamudno sodbo ugovarja pristojnosti (slovenskega) sodišča?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali lahko tožena stranka, ki ne vloži odgovora na tožbo, v pritožbi zoper zamudno sodbo ugovarja pristojnost (slovenskega) sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje se je izreklo za nepristojno ter skladno s tretjim odstavkom18. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) tožbo zavrglo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep.

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).