Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep I R 135/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:I.R.135.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Ptuj District Court due to complete judge disqualification in Bistrica.

Case Number VSRS Sklep I R 135/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia delegated jurisdiction to the District Court in Ptuj because all judges at the District Court in Slovenska Bistrica were disqualified. The plaintiff argued that the disqualification of all four judges necessitated urgent delegation under Article 66 of the Act on Civil Procedure. The court agreed, selecting Ptuj as the alternative venue since it lies outside the Maribor District Court's jurisdiction where the plaintiff resides.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 66 of the Act on Civil Procedure; urgent delegation of jurisdiction is established when all judges of a competent court are disqualified, requiring the transfer of the case to another court within the same jurisdictional area.

Keywords

AI generated
urgent delegation judge disqualification jurisdiction transfer civil procedure court venue

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 66 of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 88/2017
Supreme Court transfers case to Velje court due to potential bias from plaintiff being a judge.
VSC Sklep I Cp 274/2024
Appeal dismissed; exclusive territorial jurisdiction applies to property rights protection disputes regardless of claim type.
Sklep I R 112/2007
Employment at another court within the same judicial district does not justify a transfer request under ZPP Art. 67.
Sklep I R 162/2009
Personal distrust of judges and dissatisfaction with past proceedings cannot justify transferring jurisdiction under ZPP Art. 67.
VSRS Sklep I R 22/2020
Supreme Court dismisses request for jurisdiction transfer due to lack of objective impartiality grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče na Ptuju.

[JEDRO]

Ker so vse sodnice izločene, je predlog za nujno delegacijo utemeljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. V nepravdni zadevi N 18/2020 Okrajnega sodišča v Slovenski Bistrici so bile izločene vse štiri sodnice tega sodišča. Okrajno sodišče v Slovenski Bistrici je zato nepravdno zadevo zaradi nujne delegacije pristojnosti predložilo Višjemu sodišču v Mariboru, to pa Vrhovnemu sodišču, ki naj odloči, da naj postopa v zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče z njegovega območja.

2. Gre za primer nujne delegacije po 66. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Vrhovno sodišče je za postopanje v tej zadevi določilo Okrajno sodišče na Ptuju, saj se nahaja izven območja Okrožnega sodišča v Mariboru, katerega sodnica je tožnica.