Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 116/2019-6 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:VIII.DOR.116.2019.6 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding second instance court's application of substantive law on evidence submission for social aid.

Case Number VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 116/2019-6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review appeal concerning the second instance court's application of substantive law regarding the obligation to submit proof of intended use for extraordinary monetary social assistance. The defendant argued that judicial practice on this evidentiary requirement was inconsistent, citing a prior case with the same plaintiff where the court ruled differently. The court found the conditions for admitting the review met under the relevant procedural law provision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), prvi odstavek 367.a člena: The Supreme Court may admit a review appeal when the second instance court has incorrectly applied substantive law, even if the lower court's decision was otherwise procedurally correct.

Keywords

AI generated
review appeal admissibility substantive law application social assistance evidence intended use proof second instance review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Psp 319/2018
Appeal dismissed; failure to prove use of social aid within 30 days bars future claims.
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Psp 332/2022
Appeal dismissed; failure to prove expenditure of prior extraordinary social aid blocks new aid entitlement.
VDSS sodba Psp 101/2016
Appeal dismissed; claimant denied social aid due to sufficient funds and failure to prove debt origin.
VDSS sodba Psp 542/2014
Appeal dismissed; applicant denied social aid due to insufficient assets and income despite property value correction.
VDSS Sodba Psp 422/2017
Appeal dismissed; social assistance eligibility assessed based on financial status at application date, not later events.
VDSS sodba Psp 287/2011
Appeal dismissed; single-parent family bonus denied due to absence from work while serving prison sentence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče druge stopnje pravilno uporabilo materialno pravo glede obveznosti predložitve dokazila o namenski porabi izredne denarne socialne pomoči.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče druge stopnje pravilno uporabilo materialno pravo glede obveznosti predložitve dokazila o namenski porabi izredne denarne socialne pomoči.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek na odpravo odločb toženke z dne 19. 4. 2018 in CSD A. z dne 23. 3. 2018 ter za priznanje pravice do izredne denarne socialne pomoči.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi tožnika ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je odločbi toženke z dne 19. 4. 2018 in CSD A. z dne 23. 3. 2018 odpravilo in zadevo vrnilo v ponovno upravno odločanje.

3. Toženka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije. Navaja, da je praksa sodišča druge stopnje glede obveznosti predložitve dokazila o namenski porabi izredne denarne socialne pomoči neenotna, saj je sodišče druge stopnje v zadevi Psp 319/2018 (kjer je šlo za istega tožnika) odločilo drugače kot v tem sporu.

4. Predlog je utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da so glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 s spremembami), zato je revizijo dopustilo.