Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 138/2019-11 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.138.2019.11 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding whether the fair compensation presumption in ZPre-1 is rebuttable.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 138/2019-11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review of the second-instance decision concerning the exclusion of minority shareholders. The lower courts had approved the process for determining a suitable monetary compensation for the minority shareholders of company C. d. d., but the second instance court rejected the applicants' proposal and ordered them to pay costs. The Supreme Court granted the review request specifically on the question of whether the statutory presumption of fair compensation under Article 68(2) of the Takeover Act is rebuttable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68(2) of the Takeover Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure: The presumption of fair compensation established in the Takeover Act is rebuttable, and a review of this specific legal issue is admissible before the Supreme Court.

Keywords

AI generated
Takeover Act fair compensation presumption rebuttable minority shareholders review admissibility ZPre-1 ZPP review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68(2) of the Takeover Act (ZPre-1)
Article 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSK Sklep Cpg 105/2019
Appeal court allows appeal against lower court's order for minority shareholder exclusion compensation review. Minority shareholders cannot challenge compensation adequacy if takeover bid is lawful.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 31/2021-3
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against a decision annulled in a restoration of enforceability proceeding due to lack of legal interest.
VSM sklep I Cpg 71/2015
Appeal allowed: 90% threshold for minority shareholder exclusion must be met via takeover bid, not pre-bid shareholding.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 709/2021
Appeal dismissed; minority shareholder exclusion valid if cash-out equals takeover offer price under takeover law.
Sklep III Ips 56/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal, voids lower rulings for procedural violation regarding minority shareholder liquidation rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je domneva pravičnega nadomestila iz drugega odstavka 68. člena Zakona o prevzemnih (ZPre-1) izpodbojna?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali je domneva pravičnega nadomestila iz drugega odstavka 68. člena Zakona o prevzemnih (ZPre-1) izpodbojna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je sklenilo, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za izvedbo postopka za sodni preizkus in določitev primerne denarne odpravnine, ponujene v postopku izključitve manjšinskih delničarjev družbe C., d. d., matična številka: ....

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi nasprotne udeleženke ugodilo in izpodbijani sklep spremenilo tako, da je predlog predlagateljev zavrnilo. Predlagateljem je naložilo povrnitev stroškov pritožbenega postopka nasprotnega udeleženca v znesku 1.860,00 EUR.

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje vlagajo predlagatelji predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).