Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cpg 660/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:I.CPG.660.2019 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where withdrawal occurred before second instance decision. Appeal withdrawn before ruling, court notes withdrawal. Withdrawal before decision results in noting withdrawal only.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cpg 660/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second-instance court noted the withdrawal of the appeal rather than ruling on the merits because the withdrawal occurred before a decision was made. The parties had appealed a first-instance rejection of their objection to a court fee order, arguing for a new fee calculation. Since the withdrawal was timely and prior to any judgment, the court was legally bound to record the withdrawal and dismiss the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 334. odst. 2; ZST-1 1. odst. 3: If an appeal is withdrawn before the court makes a decision in the appeal proceedings, the court shall only note the withdrawal.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure court fee order ZPP appeal withdrawal procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
334. odst. 2 ZPP
1. odst. 3 ZST-1
338. odst. 1 ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 421/2010
Appeal allowed; procedural continuity means old tax law applies to transformed execution into legal proceedings.
VSL Sklep III Cp 2215/2024
Appeal dismissed; family data mandatory for tax exemption; court cannot investigate facts in application process.
VSL sklep I Cpg 618/2012
Appeal dismissed; court fee based on original claim value despite partial withdrawal of other claims.
sklep I U 1740/2011
Administrative court dismissed appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling the case belongs to the District Court.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 70/2022
Appeal dismissed; court upheld mandatory court fee payment at appeal notice as constitutionally valid legislative discretion.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik pritožbe.

[JEDRO]

Ker je pritožbeno sodišče umik pritožbe prejelo pred odločanjem v pritožbenem postopku, je ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom, ugovor tožečih strank zoper plačilni nalog za plačilo sodne takse za tožbo tega sodišča opr. št. VIII Pg 1551/2019 z dne 13. 9. 2019, zavrnilo.

2. Proti sklepu sta se tožeči stranki pravočasno pritožili iz vseh pritožbenih razlogov po prvem odstavku 338. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) v zvezi s tretjim odstavkom 1. člena Zakona o sodnih taksah (ZST-1). Sodišču druge stopnje sta predlagali, da pritožbi ugodi in izpodbijani sklep razveljavi ter izda nov plačilni nalog v skladu s predlogom tožečih strank.

3. Tožeči stranki sta 6. 11. 2019 pritožbo umaknili.

4. Sodišče druge stopnje je zato v skladu z določilom drugega odstavka 334. člena ZPP v zvezi s tretjim odstavkom 1. člena ZST-1, ker je umik pritožbe prejelo pred odločanjem v pritožbenem postopku, le ugotovilo njen umik.