Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 131/2019-8 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.131.2019.8 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding mandatory new court fee order based on Constitutional Court decision.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 131/2019-8
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the review request specifically concerning whether the appellate court was obligated to issue a new court fee order following a Constitutional Court ruling. The third defendant had previously received a partial fee waiver from the first instance court, which the appellate court upheld before the review was filed. The court decided to allow the review because the conditions under Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were met for this specific legal question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 10 of the Act on Court Fees: A review is permitted when a lower court fails to issue a new court fee order as required by a Constitutional Court decision, even if a partial fee waiver was previously granted.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure Constitutional Court decision court fee order mandatory fee payment review admissibility partial fee waiver appellate court obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 10 of the Act on Court Fees

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Constitutional Court decision U-I-46/15 of 25 April 2018
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III Ips 5/2020
Supreme Court allows appeal, overturning lower courts' fee reduction due to Constitutional Court ruling on fee caps.
VSL Sklep VII Kp 46987/2016
Appeal dismissed because pre-novel court fee exemption rules applied, not allowing full waiver based on new income criteria.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1324/2017
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on tax exemption and income calculation.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1612/2015
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on tax exemption due to lack of new evidence.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1233/2018
Appeal partially allowed correcting court fee installment calculation; credit obligations excluded from fee waiver but considered for installments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo pritožbeno sodišče upoštevaje odločbo Ustavnega sodišča opr. št. U-I-46/15 z dne 25. 4. 2018 po uradni dolžnosti dolžno izdati nov plačilni nalog za plačilo sodne takse za postopek pred sodiščem druge stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo pritožbeno sodišče upoštevaje odločbo Ustavnega sodišča opr. št. U-I-46/15 z dne 25. 4. 2018 po uradni dolžnosti dolžno izdati nov plačilni nalog za plačilo sodne takse za postopek pred sodiščem druge stopnje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za odločitev o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, ugodilo predlogu tretje toženke za oprostitev plačila sodne takse za postopek pred sodiščem druge stopnje na način, da jo je delno oprostilo plačila sodne takse. Odločilo je, da je dolžna odmerjeno sodno takso plačati do 1/3 celotnega zneska, kar znaša 20.985,00 EUR, in sicer v 24 zaporednih mesečnih obrokih (vsak po 874,38 EUR).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tretje toženke zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje tretja toženka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).