Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VDSS Sklep Pdp 498/2019 ECLI:SI:VDSS:2019:PDP.498.2019 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the respondent failed to sign the appeal, rendering it incomplete under ZPP rules.

Case Number VDSS Sklep Pdp 498/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Second Instance Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the respondent against the first-instance judgment regarding unpaid wages and vacation pay. The respondent argued for specific monetary adjustments, but the court found the appeal procedurally defective due to the absence of a signature. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as incomplete under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 335. člen; 343. člen (3. odst.) 346. člen: An appeal is inadmissible if it lacks the required signature of the appellant, rendering it incomplete and subject to dismissal.

Keywords

AI generated
incomplete appeal missing signature procedural defect ZPP appeal rules dismissal of appeal civil procedure wage dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
335. člen ZPP
343. člen (3. odst.) ZPP
346. člen ZPP
Ker tožena stranka pritožbe ni podpisala, se pritožba kot nepopolna zavrže (346. člen ZPP).
AI generated
VDSS sodba Pdp 488/2016
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance judgment on employee transport cost reimbursement and severance.
VDSS sodba Pdp 111/2013
Appeal dismissed; service on registered address valid for sole proprietor under ZPP s. 139(3).
VDSS sodba Pdp 167/2013
Appeal dismissed; court held interest on gross amounts is illegal, but lower court correctly awarded interest on net amounts.
VDSS sklep Pdp 453/2014
Appeal granted; default judgment revoked due to improper service of counterclaim notice under ZPP. Default judgment revoked due to improper service of counterclaim notice under ZPP.
VDSS sklep Pdp 448/2016
Appeal allowed; service on wrong address by plaintiff knowing true address constitutes abuse of rights under ZPP. 11. ZPP

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker tožena stranka pritožbe ni podpisala, se pritožba kot nepopolna zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z zamudno sodbo in sklepom z dne 20. 2. 2019 odločilo, da je tožena stranka dolžna plačati tožniku del plače za februar 2018 v višini 57,31 EUR, del plače za marec 2018 v višini 300,00 EUR, del plače za april 2018 v višini 977,00 EUR s pp, sorazmerni del regresa za letni dopust v višini 165,00 EUR s pp in nadomestilo za neizkoriščen letni dopust v višini 585,20 EUR, v roku 15 dni (1. - 5. alineja I. točke izreka), del obrestnega zahtevka je zavrnilo (II. točka izreka), del tožbe pa je zavrglo (III. točka izreka).

2. Zoper 2., 3. in 5. alinejo I. točke izreka navedene odločbe se je pritožila tožena stranka.

3. Pritožba je nepopolna.

4. Po 335. členu ZPP mora pritožba obsegati: 1. navedbo sodbe, zoper katero se vlaga; 2. izjavo, da se sodba izpodbija v celoti ali v določnem delu; 3. pritožbene razloge in 4. podpis pritožnika. Po tretjem odstavku 343. člena ZPP je pritožba nepopolna, če ne vsebuje sestavin iz 1. in 4. točke 335. člena ZPP.

5. Ker tožena stranka pritožbe ni podpisala, se pritožba kot nepopolna zavrže (346. člen ZPP).