Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 61/2019 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:II.DOR.61.2019 AI generated

Supreme Court allows partial review regarding legal interest for declaratory action and legality of lower court ruling.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 61/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia partially allowed the review application concerning the legality of the second-instance decision and the existence of a legal interest in the specific declaratory action. The lower courts had previously partially stayed and partially dismissed the lawsuit regarding property ownership and unit status disputes. The Court granted the review because the applicant met the statutory conditions for review under the Code of Civil Procedure, citing the need for legal certainty and consistent application of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 324, paragraph 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is admissible if the applicant demonstrates a legal interest in the specific proceedings and the challenged decision is unlawful, provided the review addresses issues of legal certainty and uniform application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure legal interest declaratory action review application legal certainty uniform application of law property ownership dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324, paragraph 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sklep II Ips 511/93
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to insufficient case value under transitional procedural rules.
VSL sodba I Cp 3185/2015
Parking space deemed accessory to apartment based on purchase price inclusion despite omission in contract.
VSK sodba I Cp 1619/2005
Co-owner cannot demand possession of undivided property via lawsuit without physical division or separate units.
VSL Sodba I Cp 875/2019
Appeal dismissed; court upheld transfer of usage right via administrative decision and adverse possession. 10 words.
VSL sodba II Cp 1521/94
Appeal dismissed; servitude extinguished by three-year non-use due to owner's opposition.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je v konkretnem postopku podan pravni interes za ugotovitveno tožbo in ali je izpodbijani sklep zakonit.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je v konkretnem postopku podan pravni interes za ugotovitveno tožbo in ali je izpodbijani sklep zakonit.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je postopek zaradi delnega umika tožbe deloma ustavilo (glede lastništva nad garažo, kletjo in parkirnim mestom); deloma je tožbo zavrglo (glede ugotovitve, da je prvo nadstropje hiše enota etažne lastnine), v preostanku pa je ugotovilo, da je tožnica izključna lastnica prvega nadstropja in podstrešja stanovanjske hiše na naslovu ... Odločilo je še o pravdnih stroških.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je ugodilo pritožbama tožencev in izpodbijano sodbo razveljavilo ter tožbi, vloženi zoper prvo toženko ter zoper drugega toženca in tretjo toženko, zavrglo. Odločilo je še o stroških celotnega postopka.

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje je tožnica vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije, v katerem predlaga dopustitev revizije glede dveh vprašanj, katerih pomembnost utemeljuje z zagotovitvijo pravne varnosti, enotne uporabe prava in razvojem prava preko sodne prakse. Zatrjuje odstop od sodne prakse Vrhovnega sodišča.

4. Predlog je deloma utemeljen.

5. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) so izpolnjeni glede vprašanja, navedenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo v tem obsegu dopustilo.

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu vrhovnih sodnice in sodnikov, ki so navedeni v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).