Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 276/2019 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:II.DOR.276.2019 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding material legal correctness of second instance court's decision on damages claim.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 276/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia partially allowed the applicant's request for leave to appeal. The first instance court rejected a claim for non-material damages totaling 12,000 EUR, and the second instance court upheld this ruling. The Supreme Court found that the conditions for an appeal were met specifically regarding the question of whether the second instance court's decision on the basis of the claim was materially legally correct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; An appeal is permitted if the decision of the court of second instance on the basis of the claim is materially legally incorrect.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure appeal admissibility material legal correctness non-material damages second instance court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSK sodba I Cp 1314/2006
Appeal dismissed; employer-paid insurance bars cumulative claim against tortfeasor for non-property damage.
VSM Sklep I Cp 237/2019-1
Appeal allowed: Court remands case due to incomplete transcript of recorded hearings violating fair trial rights.
VSL sodba I Cp 3420/2012
Appeal partially allowed; court held non-pecuniary damages calculation is a matter of law, not fact, and neighbor's care for others is not compensable damage.
VSL Sodba I Cp 870/2017
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove causation and timely alleged defective footwear causing slip.
Sodba II Ips 55/2007
Appeal dismissed; contradiction requires conflict between court findings and documents, not just evidence vs. reasoning.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odločitev sodišča druge stopnje o temelju tožbenega zahtevka materialnopravno pravilna.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odločitev sodišča druge stopnje o temelju tožbenega zahtevka materialnopravno pravilna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo odškodnine iz naslova nepremoženjske škode zaradi izgube bližnjega v višini 12.000,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Odločilo je, da je tožnik dolžan tožencu povrniti pravdne stroške.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je tožnikovo pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije in predlagal dopustitev revizije glede dveh pravnih vprašanj.

4. Predlog je delno utemeljen.

5. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede vprašanja, navedenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo v tem obsegu dopustilo.