Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cpg 397/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:I.CPG.397.2019 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal renders appeal inadmissible under ZPP Art. 343(4).

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cpg 397/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court in Ljubljana dismissed the appeal lodged against a first-instance enforcement judgment. The appellant timely filed the appeal but subsequently withdrew it on June 20, 2019, while also requesting cost sharing and a refund of half the court fee. The court ruled that under Article 343(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, a withdrawn appeal becomes inadmissible, leading to its rejection under Article 346(1).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 343(4); ZPP 346(1): Upon withdrawal of an appeal, the appeal becomes inadmissible and must be rejected by the court.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal inadmissibility civil procedure code cost sharing court fee refund enforcement judgment higher court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 343(4)
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 346(1)
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 554/2015
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by focusing on filing date instead of trial date for debt assessment.
VSM Sodba I Cpg 40/2018
Appeal partially allowed; VAT on business expenses rejected; three-year statute of limitations applied to commercial lease dispute.
VSL Sodba I Cp 876/2017
Appeal dismissed; employee's negligence caused loss, and admission of debt barred statute of limitations defense.
VSL sodba I Cpg 45/2016
Appeal dismissed; court held reduction of commission requires specific claim, not mere objection, under OZ s. 846.3.
VSL sodba in sklep I Cpg 57/2012
Appeal court partially allowed claim regarding legal costs when plaintiff partially withdrew lawsuit after first instance judgment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Po umiku pritožbe postane pritožba nedovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z uvodoma citirano sodbo je sodišče prve stopnje vzdržalo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani VL 25021/2017 z dne 24. 3. 2017 v prvem odstavku izreka za 4.214,69 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 1.487,18 EUR od 29. 12. 2016 dalje, od 1.763,71 od 11. 11. 2016 dalje ter od 963,80 EUR od 4. 12. 2016 dalje; v tretjem odstavku izreka pa za 44 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 22. 4. 2107 dalje (I. točka izreka). Toženi stranki je naložilo še plačilo pravdnih stroškov tožeče stranke v višini 536,21 EUR (II. točka izreka).

2. Tožena stranka se je zoper sodbo pravočasno pritožila, vendar je pritožbo z vlogo z dne 20. 6. 2019 umaknila. V navedeni vlogi je še navedla, da sta se pravdni stranki dogovorili, da nosita vsaka svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka, hkrati pa je podala tudi zahtevo za povrnitev polovice sodne takse za pritožbeni postopek.

3. Odločba, s katero se je končal postopek pred sodiščem prve stopnje, je bila izdana 9. 1. 2019, kar je po 14. 9. 2017, ko se je začel uporabljati Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS št. 10/2017; v nadaljevanju ZPP-E).

4. Po umiku pritožbe postane pritožba nedovoljena (četrti odstavek 343. člena ZPP). Zato jo je sodnica poročevalka višjega sodišča, ki mu je bila pritožba predložena v reševanje, s sklepom zavrgla (prvi odstavek 346. člena ZPP).