Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 34/2019-10 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.34.2019.10 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a debtor lost pre-signing objections by signing a debt assignment agreement.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 34/2019-10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request for leave to appeal specifically concerning whether the debtor forfeited pre-signing objections by executing a debt assignment agreement. The lower court had dismissed the appeal, and the applicant argued that the assignment extinguished their right to raise objections. The court ruled that the specific legal question regarding the loss of objections via assignment warrants appellate review, while dismissing other non-essential legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: The Supreme Court may grant leave for appeal if the question concerns the interpretation of the law or the application of a legal provision to the facts of the case, even if the lower court's decision is not legally erroneous.

Keywords

AI generated
debt assignment agreement loss of objections leave for appeal Supreme Court review Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 1349/99
Court dismisses enforcement objection because debtor admitted business relationship and failed to prove otherwise.
VSL sodba II Cpg 1426/2015
Appeal dismissed; withdrawal of admission requires justification under Civil Procedure Act rules.
VSL sodba II Cpg 1266/2015
Appeal dismissed: failure to prove negative facts via witness hearing did not constitute a material procedural violation in small-value disputes.
VSL sodba I Cpg 449/2008
Appeal court reversed first instance judgment, dismissing claim for damages due to contract termination timing.
VSL Sodba II Cp 846/2019
Leasing contract breach dismissed; lessee bears risk of theft per clear contract terms and general conditions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

- Ali je dolžnik glede na okoliščine obravnavanega primera s podpisom pogodbe o prodaji terjatev z dne 19. 12. 2013 proti prevzemniku terjatve izgubil ugovore, ki jih je imel do podpisa te pogodbe?

[JEDRO]

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja ali je dolžnik glede na okoliščine obravnavanega primera s podpisom pogodbe o prodaji terjatev z dne 19. 12. 2013 proti prevzemniku terjatve izgubil ugovore, ki jih je imel do podpisa te pogodbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za presojo predloga, ohranilo v veljavi 1. in 3. odstavek sklepa o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani opr. št. VL 100942/2015 z dne 2. 9. 2015. Predmet tožbenega zahtevka je plačilo 9.271,00 EUR s pripadki.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožena stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo. Glede preostalih zastavljenih vprašanj predlogu ni ugodilo, saj vprašanja niso pomembna pravna vprašanja.