Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 2506/2018 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:I.CP.2506.2018 AI generated

Slovenian court dismisses appeal when appellant withdraws it before second instance decision.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 2506/2018
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second instance court dismissed the appellant's appeal after the appellant withdrew it via written statement before a final ruling was issued. The appellant had initially lodged a timely appeal against a first-instance judgment declaring three sales contracts void and invalidating land registry entries. The court ruled that because the withdrawal occurred prior to the second instance decision, the appeal was legally extinguished under the relevant procedural code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o postopku pri civilnih tožbah (ZPP), drugi odstavek 334. člena: Če stranka umakne pritožbo pred odločitvijo sodišča druge stopnje, sodišče ugotovi umik in odloči skladno s tem.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure civil procedural law extinguishment of appeal written statement withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o postopku pri civilnih tožbah (ZPP), drugi odstavek 334. člena
AI generated
VSC Sodba Cp 196/2020
Appeal dismissed; denationalization claims rejected due to legal bars and invalidity of prior disposition acts.
VSL Sodba I Cp 2356/2018
Appeal dismissed; sales contract voided as hidden commission agreement violating Section 132 SPZ.
Sodba II Ips 328/2002
Supreme Court dismisses appeal upholding property contract validity despite alleged lack of realization and gift of foreign property.
VSM sodba I Cp 1453/2013
Appeal dismissed; small claims court must treat execution objection and preparatory motion as a whole response to suit.
VSM Sodba I Cp 1062/2017
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance ruling on property rights transfer and signature verification. The court rejected the appellant's claim regarding the invalidity of a property sale contract. The court confirmed the lower court's decision based on the lack of capacity to dispose of property. The court ruled that the signature verification was a procedural requirement for property registration. The court held that the appellant failed to prove the contract's validity. The court determined that the appellant bore the costs of the appeal proceedings. The court affirmed the lower court's decision on the property dispute. The court found no error in the first-instance judgment. The court dismissed the appeal on procedural and substantive grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Če stranka umakne pritožbo, preden je sodišče druge stopnje o njej odločilo, sodišče druge stopnje ugotovi umik pritožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, ugotovilo ničnost treh kupoprodajnih pogodb, ugotovilo neveljavnost zemljiškoknjižnih vpisov, vzpostavilo prejšnje zemljiškoknjižno stanje ter toženi stranki naložilo plačilo pravdnih stroškov tožeče stranke.

2. Prva tožena stranka je proti odločitvi sodišča prve stopnje po svoji pooblaščenki 11. 5. 2018 pravočasno vložila pritožbo, a jo je nato s pisno izjavo s 1. 2. 2019, podano po zakonitem zastopniku, umaknila.

3. Pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je prva tožena stranka umaknila pritožbo, preden je o njej odločilo sodišče druge stopnje, zato je skladu z določbo drugega odstavka 334. člena ZPP o vloženi pritožbi odločilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa.