Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 540/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:II.CP.540.2019 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as defendant withdrew appeal before second instance court issued a decision.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 540/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second instance court terminated the proceedings after the defendant withdrew their appeal before a final decision was rendered. The defendant had initially challenged a first-instance judgment ordering them to pay €30,000 in damages and legal costs. The court ruled that under the relevant procedural law, a party may withdraw an appeal at any time prior to the issuance of a court decision, thereby ending the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 2. odst. 334. člen: A party may withdraw an appeal at any time before the second instance court issues a decision, resulting in the termination of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure termination of proceedings ZPP 334. člen civil litigation appeal withdrawal procedural termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odst. 334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cp 2092/2012
Appeal dismissed; defendant failed to prove financial lease contract signed in error or without signature.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 110/2018
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for review permission due to non-fulfillment of Article 367 ZPP conditions.
VSL sodba III Cp 907/2015
Contractor's appeal dismissed; client failed to prove defect value and must file counterclaim for price reduction.
VSK sodba Cpg 246/2010
Court dismisses appeal against carrier's claim for reimbursement from subcarrier under transport law.
VSL sklep I Cp 4345/2009
Appeal allowed; first instance court violated evidence safeguards by rejecting defendant's relevant damage assessment requests without justification.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umik pritožbe z 22. 5. 2019 se vzame na znanje in se postopek konča.

[JEDRO]

Postopek se zaradi umika pritožbe ustavi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijano sodbo vzdržalo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani VL 93388/2015 z 11. 8. 2015 v 1. točki izreka v delu, s katerim je toženi stranki naloženo plačilo 30.000 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 1. 8. 2015 dalje in v 3. točki izreka, s katerim je toženi stranki naloženo plačilo stroškov izvršilnega postopka v višini 156 EUR (I. točka izreka). Toženi stranki je naložilo plačati tožeči stranki 3.568,20 EUR nadaljnjih stroškov pravdnega postopka v 15 dneh, v primeru zamude z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi (II. točka izreka).

2. Zoper sodbo se pritožuje tožena stranka in predlaga ugoditev pritožbi ter spremembo izpodbijane sodbe tako, da se tožbeni zahtevek zavrne in tožeči stranki naloži v plačilo vse stroške postopka, podredno pa, da se izpodbijano sodbo razveljavi in zadevo vrne prvostopenjskemu sodišču v novo sojenje.

3. Z vlogo z 22. 5. 2019 je tožena stranka pritožbo umaknila.

4. Po določilu drugega odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe. Ker je tožena stranka že vloženo pritožbo umaknila, predno je sodišče druge stopnje izdalo odločbo, je sodišče s tem sklepom umik pritožbe vzelo na znanje in postopek v tem delu ustavilo.