Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 476/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:I.CP.476.2019 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal claim, ruling withdrawal before second instance judgment is legally effective. Withdrawal before second instance judgment is legally effective without merit review.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 476/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court in Ljubljana ruled to find the withdrawal of the appeal, dismissing the applicant's request for a separate procedural determination. The applicant withdrew the appeal filed against a lower court's cost order before the second instance court rendered its decision. The court held that under the Code of Civil Procedure, such a withdrawal is automatically effective without requiring a substantive review of the appeal's merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člena ZPP v zvezi s 1. odst. 366. člena ZPP: Če stranka umakne pritožbo pred odločitvijo sodišča druge stopnje, sodišče ugotovi umik pritožbe brez meritorne obravnave.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure Code of Civil Procedure procedural withdrawal effectiveness of withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člena ZPP
1. odstavek 366. člena ZPP
AI generated
VSL sodba II Cpg 1994/2014
Appeal dismissed; first-instance court bound by material facts in small value disputes regarding management agreements.
VSL sklep I Cp 1284/99
Appeal allowed; new evidence of settlement agreement invalidates partial cost ruling requiring retrial.
VSL sklep II Cp 2105/2012
Appeal dismissed; lawyer fee for settlement requires actual agreement, not mere effort, and partial fees apply if case value drops.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 688/2016
Appeal dismissed; ZOZP remains lex specialis over ZPIZ-2 until specific 190.a article amendment.
VSL Sodba II Cpg 590/2019
Appeal dismissed; clear request for oral hearing required, not implied by evidence request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik pritožbe.

[JEDRO]

Če stranka umakne pritožbo, preden je sodišče druge stopnje o njej odločilo, sodišče druge stopnje ugotovi umik pritožbe (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 366. člena ZPP), ne da bi jo meritorno obravnavalo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Pritožnik je z vlogo z dne 22. 5. 2019 umaknil pritožbo, ki jo je 9. 11. 2018 vložil proti sklepu Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani III P 2333/2016 z dne 8. 10. 2019, s katerim mu je naložilo plačilo stroškov njegovega prevoza na sodišče.

2. Če stranka umakne pritožbo, preden je sodišče druge stopnje o njej odločilo, sodišče druge stopnje ugotovi umik pritožbe (2. odst. 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP v zvezi s 1. odst. 366. člena ZPP), ne da bi jo meritorno obravnavalo.