Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 194/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:II.CP.194.2019 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by plaintiff during appellate court proceedings via settlement in related case.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 194/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court declared the appeal withdrawn because the plaintiff submitted a statement of withdrawal as part of a settlement in a related civil matter. Although the appeal was lodged on October 24, 2018, the court received evidence of the withdrawal from a main hearing held in April 2019 regarding a different case where parties reached a settlement. The court ruled that an appeal remains withdrawable until the appellate court issues its final decision, thereby validating the plaintiff's action.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 1999, 334. člen: An appeal may be withdrawn at any time before the appellate court issues its decision, and such withdrawal is effective upon the court's acceptance of the statement.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal settlement agreement appellate procedure plaintiff withdrawal civil litigation related case procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku 1999
AI generated
VSM sklep I Cp 434/2015
Appeal dismissed; third-party objection rejection bars execution challenge unless uprker opposes.
VDSS sklep Pdp 679/2015
Appeal court reversed first instance, rejecting creditor's claim for litigation costs due to bankruptcy non-claim.
VDSS sklep Psp 357/2015
Appeal dismissed because the plaintiff filed the lawsuit after the 30-day deadline expired under ZDSS-1.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 205/2023
Appeal dismissed; court held no third warning needed for tax appeal consequences under ZST-1.
Sklep II Ips 540/96
Appeal dismissed: Action for inadmissible enforcement without enforcement court referral is inadmissible under ZIP Art. 54. and 57.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba tožene stranke z dne 24. 10. 2018 zoper sklep Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani I P 1268/2018 z dne 8. 10. 2018 umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Še preden je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo o pritožbi, je prejelo zapisnik o opravljeni glavni obravnavi v drugi pravdni zadevi s sklenjeno sodno poravnavo pravdnih strank. Sestavni del te sodne poravnave je izjava tožnika o umiku pritožbe v predmetni zadevi, zaradi česar pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je ta pritožba umaknjena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je 8. 10. 2018 izdalo sklep o zavrženju nasprotne tožbe z dne 18. 6. 2018.

2. Zoper navedeni sklep je tožnik 24. 10. 2018 vložil pritožbo. Še preden je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo o pritožbi, je prejelo zapisnik o opravljeni glavni obravnavi pri Okrožnem sodišču v Ljubljani z dne 18. 4. 2019 v pravdni zadevi P 535/2017-I s sklenjeno sodno poravnavo, ki sta jo sklenili pravdni stranki. Sestavni del sodne poravnave je izjava tukajšnjega tožnika o umiku pritožbe z dne 24. 10. 2018, ki jo je vložil zoper izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. 10. 2018.

3. Dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo. Zato je pritožbeno sodišče sklenilo, kot je razvidno iz izreka sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku 1 ).

1 Uradni list RS št. 26/1999 s spremembami.