Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep X DoR 153/2018-6 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:X.DOR.153.2018.6 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of administrative court decision regarding competition law appeal and procedural violations.

Case Number VSRS Sklep X DoR 153/2018-6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia permitted a review of the Administrative Court's decision rejecting a competition law appeal. The plaintiff argued that the Administrative Court should have held a main hearing and that the plaintiff must concretely demonstrate the impact of undisclosed documents to prove a significant procedural violation. The Court granted the review because the conditions for admissibility under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Code of Civil Procedure were met for the specific issues raised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 22 paragraph 1 of the Administrative Disputes Act: The Supreme Court may permit a review when the applicant demonstrates that the lower court failed to hold a main hearing or failed to adequately address the impact of undisclosed documents on the procedural outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative procedure competition law appeal undisclosed documents procedural violation main hearing requirement review admissibility significant impact

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 22 paragraph 1 of the Administrative Disputes Act
Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
AI generated
VSRS Sodba X Ips 232/2014
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on cartel claim where drug price coordination was legal under health law.
UPRS sodba I U 688/2015
Administrative court quashes competition authority decision due to incomplete fact-finding on alleged cartel communication.
UPRS sodba I U 1789/2013
Partial dismissal of competition law case; EU Treaty Article 101 requires significant cross-border trade effect analysis.
VSRS Sklep X DoR 177/2022-4
Supreme Court dismissed appeal allowing administrative court to partially revoke agency decision and order costs.
UPRS sodba in sklep I U 1800/2013
Administrative court partially dismissed competition law appeal regarding EU competition agreement findings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede naslednjih vprašanj:

— Ali bi Upravno sodišče moralo izvesti glavno obravnavo?

— Ali bi prvi tožnik v konkretnem primeru glede nerazkritih dokumentov moral konkretizirano izkazati vpliv nerazkritja, da bi utemeljil bistveno kršitev določb postopka?

— Ali je sodišče pravilno uporabilo določbo 101. člena PDEU glede učinka na trgovanje med državami članicami, zlasti kriterij znatnosti, in svojo odločitev ustrezno obrazložilo?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanj:

— Ali bi Upravno sodišče moralo izvesti glavno obravnavo?

— Ali bi prvi tožnik v konkretnem primeru glede nerazkritih dokumentov moral konkretizirano izkazati vpliv nerazkritja, da bi utemeljil bistveno kršitev določb postopka?

— Ali je sodišče pravilno uporabilo določbo 101. člena PDEU glede učinka na trgovanje med državami članicami, zlasti kriterij znatnosti, in svojo odločitev ustrezno obrazložilo?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Upravno sodišče je zavrnilo tožbo prvega tožnika zoper odločbo Javne agencije Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence št. 306-79/2010-442 z dne 29. 3. 2017.

2. Zoper sodbo Upravnega sodišča vlaga prva toženka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v zvezi z določbo prvega odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu, glede vprašanj, opredeljenih v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je odločitev sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).