Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 4/2019-6 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:VIII.DOR.4.2019.6 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding correct application of law on counting farm work as insurance period.

Case Number VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 4/2019-6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request for a review, permitting the case to proceed to the next level. The lower courts had previously ruled on whether farm work should be counted as an insurance period, with the second instance court overturning the first instance's decision in favor of the defendant. The court determined that the review was admissible because the lower courts' stance on this specific legal issue contradicted established Supreme Court practice.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), prvi odstavek 367.a člena: A review is admissible when the lower courts' application of substantive law regarding the counting of farm work as an insurance period contradicts established Supreme Court case law.

Keywords

AI generated
review admissibility farm work insurance substantive law application Supreme Court practice insurance period calculation ZPP 367.a social security benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sodba VIII Ips 306/2017
Lack of social security registration does not disprove employment; court confirms pension insurance period based on farm work facts.
VDSS sodba Psp 465/2012
Court allows farm worker's time as pensionable service period by confirming essential employment elements.
VDSS Sodba Psp 352/2018
Appeal dismissed; farm work without pension insurance coverage cannot count as insured pension period.
VDSS Sodba Psp 96/2018
Court allows appeal, ruling pension periods require both full-time employment and mandatory insurance coverage.
VDSS Sklep Psp 374/2019
Appeal court quashes first instance judgment for procedural violations and remands case for new hearing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo pravilno uporabljeno materialno pravo v zvezi z vštevanjem dela na kmetiji v zavarovalno dobo.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo pravilno uporabljeno materialno pravo v zvezi z vštevanjem dela na kmetiji v zavarovalno dobo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je odpravilo odločbi toženke z dne 22. 11. 2016 in z dne 10. 5. 2016 ter odločilo, da se tožniku v pokojninsko dobo kot zavarovalna doba všteje čas dela na kmetijskem posestvu očeta J. K. za čas od 25. 6. 1973 do 13. 4. 1974 in od 13. 6. 1975 do 31. 12. 1983.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi toženke ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.

3. Tožnik je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije. Navaja, da so stališča sodišča druge stopnje v zvezi z vštevanjem dela na kmetiji v zavarovalno dobo v nasprotju s sodno prakso Vrhovnega sodišča RS.

4. Predlog je utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da so glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 s spremembami), zato je revizijo dopustilo.