Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep IV Cp 516/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:IV.CP.516.2019 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court continued contact procedure due to opponent's objection, precluding cost ruling under ZPP 158.

Case Number VSL Sklep IV Cp 516/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal was rejected, and the first-instance court's decision was confirmed. The plaintiff withdrew a proposal to limit contact arrangements, but the opposing party objected, prompting the court to continue the procedure rather than suspend it. Consequently, the court ruled that no costs decision could be made under Article 158 of the Civil Procedure Act, as the procedural path was dictated by the opponent's stance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 158 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 35 of the Act on Civil Procedure; When a court continues a contact procedure due to an opposing party's objection to a withdrawal, no costs ruling may be issued under Article 158 of the Civil Procedure Act, and parties bear their own costs upon settlement.

Keywords

AI generated
contact procedure procedural objection costs allocation civil procedure act settlement of dispute procedural suspension opposing party rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 158 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 35 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 154 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 47 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 365 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC sklep Cp 1905/2006
Appeal allowed: Inadmissible petition costs shifted to petitioner under civil procedure rules.
VSL Sklep I Cp 316/2023
Appeal granted; court shifts litigation costs to applicant due to respondent's inability to pay despite process serving their interest.
VDSS Sklep X Pdp 535/2019
Appeal dismissed; general collective agreements cannot be challenged in collective disputes as they are not collective agreements.
VDSS Sodba in sklep Pdp 50/2021
Court allows claim for lost profit where plaintiff proved causal link between breach and lost orders.
VSL sodba I Cpg 384/2010
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to meet burden of proof for management fee claims against co-owners.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Pritožba se zavrne in se izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje potrdi.

II. Nasprotni udeleženec nosi svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka sam.

[JEDRO]

Nasprotni udeleženec se z umikom ni strinjal in je predlagal, da se postopek za ureditev stikov nadaljuje, sodišče postopka ni ustavilo, ampak ga je zaradi nasprotovanja nasprotnega udeleženca nadaljevalo, zato ni podlage za odločitev o stroških postopka v smislu določila 158. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Predlagateljica je 3. 1. 2008 vložila predlog za spremembo in omejitev stikov med sinom strank postopka, ki ga je 4. 12. 2018 umaknila. Ker se nasprotni udeleženec z umikom ni strinjal in predlagal, da se postopek za ureditev stikov nadaljuje, sodišče postopka ni ustavilo, ampak ga je zaradi nasprotovanja nasprotnega udeleženca nadaljevalo, zato ni podlage za odločitev o stroških postopka v smislu določila 158. člena ZPP, na katerega se sklicuje v pritožbi. V nadaljevanju sta udeleženca sklenila sodno poravnavo, zato je v smislu določila prvega odstavka 35. člena Zakona o nepravdnem postopku materialnopravna pravilna odločitev sodišča prve stopnje, naj vsak udeleženec trpi svoje stroške nepravdnega postopka.

2. Pritožba se tako pokaže kot neutemeljena, zato jo je bilo potrebno zavrniti in potrditi izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje (2. točka 365. člena ZPP v zvezi s 47. členom ZNP).

3. Nasprotni udeleženec, ki je v pritožbenem postopku propadel, nosi svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka sam (154. člen ZPP v zvezi s 47. členom ZNP).