Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 9/2019-9 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.9.2019.9 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to determine if funeral candle transport costs fall on the applicant or public service provider.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 9/2019-9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request for leave to appeal regarding the allocation of funeral candle transport costs. The lower courts initially ordered the applicant to pay these expenses, but the appellate court reversed this decision. The Supreme Court determined that the conditions for allowing the review are met to clarify whether the costs belong to the applicant or the public service provider.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: The Supreme Court may grant leave for appeal when a question of law arises regarding the interpretation of regulations governing specific administrative costs, such as the transport of funeral candles, to determine the proper liability between the applicant and the public service provider.

Keywords

AI generated
funeral candle transport waste management regulation cost allocation public service provider leave for appeal administrative liability Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
324. odst. 7 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL Sodba I Cpg 510/2019
Appeal court reverses first instance ruling, holding funeral candles transport costs fall on the waste service provider.
VSL sklep I Cpg 500/2010
Appeal allowed; small claims court must conduct material process leadership under ZPP to correct evidentiary errors.
Sklep Dsp 123/2008
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove deviation from Supreme Court practice or lack of uniformity.
VSRS Sodba III Ips 68/2016
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on contract price dispute where plaintiff failed to prove oral agreement for higher fees.
VDSS sodba Pdp 173/2012, enako Pdp 285/2012
Appeal dismissed; employer must pay full transport reimbursement difference per collective agreements despite unconstitutional tax regulation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je upoštevaje Uredbo o ravnanju z odpadnimi nagrobnimi svečami strošek transporta nagrobnih sveč strošek tožene stranke (nosilec skupnega načrta ravnanja z odpadnimi nagrobnimi svečami) ali tožeče stranke (izvajalec javne službe).

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je upoštevaje Uredbo o ravnanju z odpadnimi nagrobnimi svečami strošek transporta nagrobnih sveč strošek tožene stranke (nosilec skupnega načrta ravnanja z odpadnimi nagrobnimi svečami) ali tožeče stranke (izvajalec javne službe).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku za plačilo stroškov prevoza odpadnih nagrobnih sveč s posameznih pokopališč do zbirnega centra B. v letu 2013.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi toženke ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožnica vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločitev sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).