Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM Sklep II Kp 25827/2016 ECLI:SI:VSMB:2019:II.KP.25827.2016 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because no grounds for retrial were found under ZKP. The court rejected the appeal as procedurally invalid. The defendant's request for a new trial was rejected. The court upheld the lower court's decision to dismiss the appeal. The appeal was found to be inadmissible under the Criminal Procedure Act. The court ruled that the appeal lacked legal basis. The decision confirms the inadmissibility of the appeal. The court found no grounds for a retrial. The appeal was dismissed due to procedural defects. The court rejected the request for a new trial.

Case Number VSM Sklep II Kp 25827/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Maribor dismissed the defendant's appeal as inadmissible, upholding the first-instance court's rejection of the appeal against a higher court's decision. The defendant argued for a retrial, but the court found no grounds for such a request under Article 398 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was procedurally invalid and the lower court acted correctly in rejecting it.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 398, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Procedure Act: An appeal against a final decision of a higher court is inadmissible if no statutory grounds for a retrial are present, and the lower court must reject such appeals as procedurally invalid.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal Criminal Procedure Act retrial grounds procedural defect final decision higher court ZKP Article 390

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 398, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba obsojenega M.S. se zavrne kot neutemeljena.

[JEDRO]

Zavrženje nedovoljene pritožbe zoper odločbo sodišča druge stopnje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z napadenim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje pritožbo obsojenega M.S. zavrglo kot nedovoljeno.

2. Zoper tak sklep se je pritožil obsojeni z laično pritožbo, v kateri se zavzema za ponovno sojenje. Iz njegove pritožbe je razbrati, da pritožbenemu sodišču predlaga ponovno sojenje.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Pritožbeno sodišče pritrjuje odločitvi sodišča prve stopnje iz napadenega sklepa, ki je pravilno pritožbo obsojenega zoper sodbo in sklep Višjega sodišča v Mariboru II Kp 25827/2016 z dne 20. 9. 2018, kot nedovoljeno zavrglo (člen 390 Zakona o kazenskem postopku - v nadaljevanju ZKP). Pravilno je sodišče prve stopnje tudi ugotovilo, da v obravnavani zadevi ni podan nobeden od primerov iz prvega odstavkom 398. člena ZKP.

5. Zoper tak sklep se je pritožil obsojeni. Iz njegove laične pritožbe je razbrati, da ne soglaša z pravnomočno odločitvijo, ki izhaja iz odločbe Višjega sodišča v Mariboru II Kp 25827/2016 z dne 20. 9. 2018, s katero sta bili zavrnjeni pritožbi zagovornika obsojenega M.S. in izdan sklep o zavrnitvi predloga za izločitev dokazov. Pritožba zoper takšno odločbo višjega sodišča pa ni dovoljena, zato je sodišče prve stopnje ravnalo pravilno, ko je pritožbo obsojenega zavrglo.

6. S tem je sklep utemeljen.