Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 4/2019-8 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.4.2019.8 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a forced settlement conditional right becomes unconditional and binding after bankruptcy filing.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 4/2019-8
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal against the second-instance court's rejection of the appellant's claim. The appellant sought priority payment from the defendant's bank account, while the lower courts denied the request and confirmed the original judgment. The court ruled that the conditions for filing an appeal were met because the appeal addressed a specific legal question regarding the nature of the conditional right.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: An appeal is admissible if it concerns a question of law defined in the ruling, specifically whether a conditional right acquired through a forced settlement order under the Insolvency Act becomes unconditional and legally binding upon the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
forced settlement order conditional right unconditional right bankruptcy proceedings insolvency law appeal admissibility priority payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
324. odst. 7 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSRS Sodba III Ips 31/2019
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; priority right based on bankruptcy confirmation order, not prior ruling.
VSM Sodba I Cpg 286/2018
Appeal dismissed; creditor secured priority payment rights via bankruptcy settlement decree before insolvency proceedings began.
VSK Sodba II Cpg 1/2018
Appellate court partially allowed appeal, correcting debt amount in bankruptcy proceedings under ZFPPIPP.
VSC sodba Cp 157/2013
Court partially allows appeal on damages and costs, modifying first-instance judgment based on legal causation and lawyer fees.
VSC sodba Cp 1341/2003
Court partially allows appeal on blank check enforcement, reducing debt based on authorization scope and statute of limitations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali s sklepom o potrditvi prisilne poravnave pogojna ločitvena pravica, pridobljena na podlagi predhodne odredbe po ZIZ, pridobi naravo nepogojne in pravnomočno priznane ločitvene pravice, na katero kasneje začeti stečajni postopek več ne vpliva.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali s sklepom o potrditvi prisilne poravnave pogojna ločitvena pravica, pridobljena na podlagi predhodne odredbe po ZIZ, pridobi naravo nepogojne in pravnomočno priznane ločitvene pravice, na katero kasneje začeti stečajni postopek več ne vpliva.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženki naložilo prednostno poplačilo tožničine terjatve v višini 47.077,90 EUR iz ločitvenega premoženja – denarnih sredstev tožene stranke, ki se nahajajo na depozitnem računu Okrajnega sodišča v Celju.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo toženke zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje toženka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločbo sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).