Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 137/2018-9 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.137.2018.9 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether broken personal relations justify a partner's exit from a limited liability company under ZGD-1.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 137/2018-9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal against the second-instance court's decision confirming the plaintiff's exit from the limited liability company. The appellant argued that the first-instance court erred in finding that broken personal relations constituted a valid ground for withdrawal under Article 501(2) of the Company Law. The court ruled that the appeal is admissible specifically to review whether the alleged personal relationship breakdown legally justifies the partner's departure from the company.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure; Article 501(2) of the Company Law: An appeal is admissible to determine whether broken personal relations between partners constitute a valid ground for a partner's exit from a limited liability company.

Keywords

AI generated
limited liability company partner exit personal relations breakdown valid ground withdrawal civil procedure appeal ZGD-1 company law admissibility of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 501(2) of the Company Law
AI generated
VSM sklep I Ip 1426/2008
Appeal allowed; one-year deadline for continuing execution against dissolved company members suspended by Constitutional Court ruling.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2082/2022
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff company was deleted and appellant lacked standing to sue.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1806/2017
Appeal court vacates lower court ruling allowing sole shareholder to continue proceedings after company liquidation.
VSL Sklep IV Cpg 100/2021
Court allows partial appeal, ruling unpaid share transfers require shareholder assembly approval per company agreement.
Sklep II Ips 455/97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as appeal is only allowed for property disputes exceeding 80,000 tolaris.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali porušeni osebni odnosi med družbeniki predstavljajo utemeljen razlog za izstop družbenika iz družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo v smislu drugega odstavka 501. člena ZGD-1.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali porušeni osebni odnosi med družbeniki predstavljajo utemeljen razlog za izstop družbenika iz družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo v smislu drugega odstavka 501. člena ZGD-1.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo zahtevku tožnika, da z dnem pravnomočnosti sodbe izstopa iz tožene stranke in mu s tem dnem tudi preneha status družbenika v družbi.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožena stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu vrhovnih sodnikov, ki so navedeni v uvodu tega sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).