Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 13/2019-9 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.13.2019.9 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to determine if Article 433 of Obligations Act requires written contract for liability.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 13/2019-9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the second-instance judgment regarding a debt claim based on Article 433 of the Obligations Act. The first and second instances dismissed the plaintiff's claim, transferring assets post-bankruptcy without a written agreement. The court permitted the review to clarify whether liability under this article strictly demands a written contract or if a factual transfer suffices for oral agreements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 433 of the Obligations Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law: Permission for review is granted to determine if liability under Article 433 requires a written contract or if factual transfer of assets satisfies the requirement for an oral agreement.

Keywords

AI generated
Article 433 Obligations Act written contract requirement factual transfer of assets oral agreement validity permission for review bankruptcy asset transfer civil procedure review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 433 of the Obligations Act
Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
Article 324(7) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
AI generated
VSM Sodba I Cp 522/2020
Court partially allows appeal on cattle identification and adjusts costs based on mixed success and higher expenses.
VSL sodba I Cp 2094/2014
Appeal dismissed; claim for unjust enrichment rejected where beneficiary consented to the benefit. Unjust enrichment claim dismissed where beneficiary consented to the benefit.
Sklep III Ips 55/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal due to second instance court's failure to rule on all material claims.
VDSS sklep Pdp 498/2010
Appeal court quashes first instance judgment for ordering overtime work to an invalid employee, remanding for new trial.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 158/2025
Court rejects appeal, ruling training readiness counts as working time under EU Directive 2003/88/ES.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odgovornost po 433. členu OZ podana le v primeru, ko je podlaga za prenos kakšne premoženjske celote ali njenega posameznega dela pisna pogodba, oziroma ali za odgovornost po 433. členu OZ zadošča dejanski prevzem premoženja, kar bi ustrezalo ustnemu dogovoru.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odgovornost po 433. členu OZ podana le v primeru, ko je podlaga za prenos kakšne premoženjske celote ali njenega posameznega dela pisna pogodba, oziroma ali za odgovornost po 433. členu OZ zadošča dejanski prevzem premoženja, kar bi ustrezalo ustnemu dogovoru.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo izvedenih del, ki ga je tožnica vtoževala od toženke, na katero naj bi naročnik del pred stečajem prenesel svoje premoženje (433. člen Obligacijskega zakonika).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožnice zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožnica vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločbo sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).