Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 453/2018 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:II.DOR.453.2018 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses revision request as first-instance error does not meet statutory revision conditions.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 453/2018
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a revision against the second-instance judgment. The applicant argued that the lower court made an obvious factual error regarding the debt amount, which allegedly prevented the applicant from exercising their right of appeal. The court determined that the conditions for granting a revision under the Civil Procedure Act were not met because the error did not constitute a violation of the law or a significant factual mistake warranting re-examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a odst. 1 ZPP; 367.c odst. 2 ZPP: A higher court may not grant a revision request based solely on an obvious factual error by the first-instance court if such an error does not violate the law or significantly affect the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
revision permission Civil Procedure Act factual error second instance judgment supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 ZPP
367.c odst. 2 ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cp 2190/2015
Denationalization claim allowed; first instance court erred by rejecting valid claim without specific objection from defendant.
VDSS sodba, Psp 280/2010
Reimbursement denied for elective laser eye surgery abroad as it lacked medical indication under health insurance law.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 1136/2016
Appeal allowed; first instance court violated right to be heard by ignoring plaintiff's evidence.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1059/2022
Appeal dismissed; duty to inform requires warning of risks comparable to natural disease progression.
VSL sklep II Cp 2129/93
Civil court allows appeal, vacates first instance judgment, and remands case for new decision on contract validity and statute of limitations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Pogoji iz 367.a člena ZPP za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek, s katerim je tožnik od toženca zahteval 63.000,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je tožnikovo pritožbo zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije in predlagal dopustitev revizije glede naslednjih pravnih vprašanj:

- Ali sme višje sodišče ob očitni zmotni ugotovitvi odločilnega dejstva s strani prvostopnega sodišča svojo (pravnomočno) odločitev opreti na drugačno, dodatno ugotovljeno dejansko stanje?

- Ali višje sodišče na ta način stranki onemogoči pravico do pritožbe iz razloga zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve tega dodatno ugotovljenega dejanskega stanja?

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Predpostavke za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso izpolnjene. Skladno z določbo drugega odstavka 367.c člena istega zakona je zato Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.