Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 36/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2013:III.DOR.36.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding Article 362(2) of the Obligations Act not applying to legal persons.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 36/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the leave for appeal concerning the correct application of Article 362(2) of the Obligations Act. The appellant argued that this provision does not apply to the limitation period of legally incompetent legal persons. The court found that the conditions for admitting the appeal under Article 367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act were met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 362(2) of the Obligations Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act: The Supreme Court may admit an appeal if the lower court's decision concerns the correct application of the law regarding the limitation period for legally incompetent legal persons.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation period legal persons business incompetence Obligations Act Civil Procedure Act appeal admissibility supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 362(2) of the Obligations Act
Article 367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Dopusti se revizija glede vprašanja pravilne uporabe drugega odstavka 362. člena OZ o tem, da se ta določba ne uporablja za tek zastaranja poslovno nesposobnih pravnih oseb.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja pravilne uporabe drugega odstavka 362. člena OZ o tem, da se ta določba ne uporablja za tek zastaranja poslovno nesposobnih pravnih oseb.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP o vprašanju, navedenem v izreku sklepa, zato je predlogu tožene stranke za dopustitev revizije ugodilo.