Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 73/2016 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:III.DOR.73.2016 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding ownership transfer on built land under specific agricultural land law provision.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 73/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review appeal limited to the question of whether ownership transferred to the municipality on a built-up construction land site under Article 16a of the Act on the Reserve of Agricultural Land and Forests. The first-instance court declared the building right agreement void and rejected the claim against the first defendant, a ruling the second-instance court upheld. The review was permitted only because this specific legal issue constitutes a significant point of law, while other aspects were deemed unimportant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 16a of the Act on the Reserve of Agricultural Land and Forests; Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law: A review appeal is permitted regarding a specific legal question if it is of significant legal importance, even if the overall appeal is partially rejected.

Keywords

AI generated
ownership transfer built construction land agricultural land reserve building right agreement review appeal permission significant legal question municipal ownership

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 16a of the Act on the Reserve of Agricultural Land and Forests of the Republic of Slovenia
Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
AI generated
VSRS Sodba III Ips 100/2016
Supreme Court rejects appeal on agricultural land transfer to municipalities regardless of building status.
VSM Sodba I Cp 709/2025
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's finding that sale and lease agreements were void due to public auction principles.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 75/2025
Supreme Court denies leave for appeal on standing and validity of building rights registration under ZSPDSLS-1.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1213/2011
Appeal dismissed; court held liquidity is not insolvency and plaintiff failed to rebut defendant's evidence.
VSRS sodba II Ips 81/2016
Supreme Court voids life-tenancy contract parts causing protected farm co-ownership loss under ZDKG.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali je na podlagi določbe 16.a člena Zakona o Skladu kmetijskih zemljišč in gozdov Republike Slovenije na občino prešla lastninska pravica na zazidanem stavbnem zemljišču?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali je na podlagi določbe 16.a člena Zakona o Skladu kmetijskih zemljišč in gozdov Republike Slovenije na občino prešla lastninska pravica na zazidanem stavbnem zemljišču.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugotovilo, da je pogodba o stavbni pravici nična. Zahtevek zoper prvo toženko je zavrnilo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo potrdilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje druga toženka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo. Glede preostalega zastavljenega vprašanja pa predlogu ni ugodilo, saj vprašanje ni pomembno pravno vprašanje.