Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 104/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2013:III.DOR.104.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding start of termination period and one-year minimum for business space eviction.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 104/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the review request, permitting appeal on specific legal questions. The lower courts upheld the order to vacate business premises, and the appellant argued regarding the commencement of the termination period and the minimum duration of the eviction timeline. The court determined that these issues concern the correct application of substantive law and thus met the statutory criteria for review under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review is admissible when the appeal concerns the correct application of substantive law regarding the start of a termination period and the minimum duration for vacating business premises.

Keywords

AI generated
termination period business premises substantive law review admissibility eviction timeline Code of Civil Procedure vacating property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sodba II Ips 615/96
Appeal dismissed; tenant liable for usage fees after lease termination under ZOR s. 210.2.
Sklep II DoR 180/2010
Supreme Court dismisses review request as new legal questions cannot override established facts of bad faith possession.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 73/2019
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; buyer in bad faith cannot rely on land registry trust when physical possession contradicts records.
Sklep II Ips 320/2002
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because the disputed property value did not exceed the statutory threshold.
VSK sodba I Cp 1204/2004
Tenant's appeal dismissed; landlord terminated lease for two-month rent arrears under ZPSPP Art. 28. Tenant failed to prove work compensated rent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanj, kdaj začne teči odpovedni rok v primeru sodne odpovedi najemne pogodbe za poslovni prostor in ali gre v primeru določitve (najmanj) enoletnega roka za izpraznitev poslovnega prostora za vprašanje pravilne uporabe materialnega prava?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanj, kdaj začne teči odpovedni rok v primeru sodne odpovedi najemne pogodbe za poslovni prostor in ali gre v primeru določitve (najmanj) enoletnega roka za izpraznitev poslovnega prostora za vprašanje pravilne uporabe materialnega prava.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ohranilo v veljavi nalog za izpraznitev poslovnih prostorov. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo potrdilo.

2. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni, zato je Vrhovno sodišče revizijo dopustilo.