Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 40/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.40.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding whether an unpaid buyer must file a counterclaim or merely object to a price reduction request.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 40/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review of the second-instance judgment concerning a buyer's procedural options. The buyer, who had not paid the full purchase price and was named as the defendant, sought to claim a price reduction. The court determined that the conditions for admitting a review under the Code of Civil Procedure were met for this specific legal question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review is admissible when the second-instance court fails to address a specific legal issue regarding whether a defendant-buyer must file a counterclaim or can simply object to a price reduction request.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure review admissibility price reduction claim unpaid purchase price counterclaim necessity defendant buyer procedural option

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cp 3313/2016
Appeal granted; 10-year limitation period applies to claims based on enforceable notarial deeds under OZ s. 356.1.
VSL sodba in sklep I Cpg 1006/2015
Contract dispute where appeal court partially allowed appeal due to procedural error regarding claim classification.
Sklep III Ips 114/2008
Supreme Court allows appeal on sales contract statute choice, finding lower courts wrongly applied short statute of limitations.
VSL Sodba II Cpg 122/2025
Appeal allowed: Court corrects first instance for misapplying Section 72(8) of the Heating Supply Act regarding contractual relations transfer.
Sodba VIII Ips 530/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal rejecting provisory salary system as lawful under collective agreement terms.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali mora kupec, ki še ni plačal (celotne) kupnine in v pravdi nastopi kot tožena stranka, v primeru, če želi uveljaviti zahtevek za znižanje kupnine, vložiti nasprotno (oblikovalno) tožbo ali zadošča ugovor.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali mora kupec, ki še ni plačal (celotne) kupnine in v pravdi nastopi kot tožena stranka, v primeru, če želi uveljaviti zahtevek za znižanje kupnine, vložiti nasprotno (oblikovalno) tožbo ali zadošča ugovor.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za odločitev o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo preostanka kupnine za dobavljeni ležaj (prva alineja drugega odstavka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in v izpodbijanem delu potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede predlaganega vprašanja, navedenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo dopustilo.