Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 117/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.117.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding which assets of a public institution fall into bankruptcy estate.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 117/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted a review request specifically concerning the definition of assets belonging to a public institution's bankruptcy estate. The lower courts had previously dismissed the plaintiff's claims for establishing an exclusion right and a monetary debt, ordering the plaintiff to bear costs. The Supreme Court determined that the legal question regarding the scope of the bankruptcy estate was sufficiently important to warrant further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A review is permitted when a legal question arises regarding the classification of assets of a public institution within the bankruptcy estate.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy estate public institution exclusion right civil procedure review admissibility asset classification stečajna masa

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cp 1081/2012
Court dismisses property claim where plaintiff abandoned ownership rights and failed to prove possession by defendant.
VSL sodba I Cpg 753/2013
Appeal dismissed; founder's property rights transferred to foundation via 'disposal' clause, barring creditor claims.
VSL sodba I Cp 1685/2010
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove sudden illness preventing court appearance, violating mandatory attendance rules.
VSL sodba in sklep II Cp 2186/2016
Civil court dismissed plaintiff's appeal for return of property and damages due to failure of proof.
VSM sodba I Cp 1158/2013
Court dismisses adverse possession claim on public land, ruling public status blocks title acquisition regardless of good faith. Public goods cannot be acquired via adverse possession under current law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, katero premoženje v primeru stečaja javnega zavoda spada v stečajno maso.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, katero premoženje v primeru stečaja javnega zavoda spada v stečajno maso.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev obstoja izločitvene pravice tožeče stranke na v zahtevku naštetih premičninah in njihovo izročitev (I. točka izreka sodbe). Zavrnilo je tudi podredni tožbeni zahtevek na ugotovitev obstoja terjatve tožeče stranke v višini 18.490,00 EUR (II. točka izreka sodbe). Tožeči stranki je naložilo povrnitev pravdnih stroškov toženca (III. točka izreka sodbe).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje (I. točka izreka sodbe). Sklenilo je, da tožeča stranka sama krije stroške pritožbenega postopka (II. točka izreka sodbe).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Predlog je utemeljen.

5. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede pravnega vprašanja, povzetega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo v obsegu, začrtanem z navedenim vprašanjem, dopustilo.