Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep Cpg 1247/93 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1993:CPG.1247.93 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal when creditor fails to correct enforcement request after court summons. Creditor received summons and failed to amend request with full debtor details.

Case Number VSL sklep Cpg 1247/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the creditor's appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment rejecting the enforcement request. The creditor had received a court summons to correct the request but failed to provide the debtor's complete name and seat as required. The court determined the appeal was unfounded because the creditor's agent acknowledged receipt of the summons on the return receipt, proving the creditor was aware of the defect.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. točka 380. člena Zakona o postopku pri izvrševanju zbiraških terjatev v zvezi s 14. členom Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju: A creditor's failure to correct an enforcement request after a court summons to amend constitutes a valid ground for rejection, and a subsequent appeal based on non-receipt of the summons is inadmissible when the return receipt confirms delivery.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement request rejection court summons delivery correction of enforcement unfounded appeal return receipt evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. točka 380. člena ZPP
14. člen ZIP
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 73/00
Appeal allowed; court ruled that an instruction deadline for correcting a writ of execution is not a statute of limitations.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1247/99
Appeal dismissed; enforcement petition rejected for missing mandatory 's.p.' designation on sole proprietor's firm name.
VSL sklep II Cpg 924/2002
Appeal dismissed: execution request rejected because the submitted document is not a valid title for execution under ZIZ Art. 17.
VSK sklep II Cpg 204/2005
Creditor's appeal dismissed; court order upheld for failing to correct debtor name per public register.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1132/99
Appeal allowed; court held first instance must use constructive service when registry address is unclaimed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje potrdi.

[JEDRO]

Iz povratnice v spisu je razvidno, da je upnik prejel sklep o pozivu na popravo predloga za izvršbo, zato je sodišče ravnalo pravilno, ko je predlog za izvršbo zavrglo, ker ga upnik ni popravil.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrglo predlog za izvršbo, ker ga upnik kljub pozivu sodišča ni popravil tako, da bi navedel popoln naziv in sedež dolžnika.

Upnik se je zoper sklep pravočasno pritožil in predlagal njegovo razveljavitev. Navedel je, da sklepa s pozivom na popravo predloga za izvršbo nikoli ni prejel.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Iz povratnice v spisu sledi, da je bil upniku sklep sodišča prve stopnje, s katerim je bil pozvan na popravo predloga za izvršbo, vročen dne 1.6.1993. Na povratnici je označen prav ta sklep, navedeno pa je tudi ime oziroma priimek upnikovega pooblaščenca, ki je sklep sprejel. Isti pooblaščenec je naveden tudi na povratnici o prejemu sklepa o zavrženju predloga za izvršbo, za katerega pa ni nobenega dvoma, da ga je upnik prejel, saj se je proti njemu pravočasno pritožil.

Upnikova pritožba je torej neutemeljena, zato jo je pritožbeno sodišče na podlagi določbe 2. točke 380. čl. ZPP v zvezi s 14. čl. ZIP zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep.