Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VDSS sklep Pdp 1086/2015 ECLI:SI:VDSS:2016:PDP.1086.2015 AI generated

Labor court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where defendant withdraws appeal before second instance ruling.

Case Number VDSS sklep Pdp 1086/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second-instance labor court confirmed that the defendant withdrew their appeal against the first-instance judgment. The defendant had initially appealed the ruling ordering payment of 6,000 EUR and procedural costs, but voluntarily withdrew the appeal on January 11, 2016. The court ruled that because the withdrawal occurred before a final decision, the appeal was deemed withdrawn and the defendant bears the associated costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člen ZPP; 2. odstavek 158. člen ZPP: A party may withdraw an appeal filed with the second-instance court at any time before the court issues a decision, in which case the appeal is considered withdrawn and the appellant bears the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal second instance court labor dispute procedural costs Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
2. odstavek 158. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 947/2009
Appeal dismissed; claim for price reduction based on hidden defects failed due to lack of proof of seller's knowledge.
VSM Sodba I Cp 123/2019
Appeal dismissed; minor stair defect deemed insufficient to establish liability for fall.
VSL Sklep in sodba I Cpg 305/2024
Appeal dismissed; court upheld liability for workplace accident based on logical evidence assessment.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 663/2017
Appeal dismissed; employer liable for dangerous work injury, employee bears 10% contributory negligence.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 416/2019
Court partially allows appeal awarding delayed interest on non-material damages from filing date.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Ugotovi se, da je tožena stranka umaknila pritožbo zoper sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

II. Tožena stranka krije sama svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka.

[JEDRO]

Skladno z 2. odstavkom 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijano sodbo razsodilo, da je tožena stranka dolžna plačati tožeči stranki 6.000,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 15. 10. 2012 dalje do plačila, v roku 15 dni. Tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 19.000,00 EUR s pp je zavrnilo. Tožeči stranki je naložilo tudi povračilo stroškov postopka tožene stranke v znesku 505,58 EUR, v roku 15 dni, z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi, ki tečejo od prvega naslednjega dne po izteku roka za izpolnitev obveznosti, do plačila.

2. Zoper ugodilni del sodbe in odločitev o stroških se je pritožila tožena stranka, ki je z vlogo z dne 11. 1. 2016 pritožbo umaknila.

3. Skladno z 2. odstavkom 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nasl. - ZPP) lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe. Zato je pritožbeno sodišče ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena.

4. Zaradi umika pritožbe tožena stranka krije sama svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka (2. odstavek 158. člena ZPP).