Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSK sklep Cp 840/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CP.840.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because creditor withdrew enforcement request, losing legal interest to challenge the court's stop order.

Case Number VSK sklep Cp 840/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court dismissed the creditor's challenge to the first-instance decision halting enforcement proceedings. Although the creditor initially argued the debtor had not fully paid the debt, they later withdrew the enforcement request during the appeal phase. The court ruled that since the creditor withdrew the enforcement request rather than the appeal, they no longer possessed a legal interest to contest the court's order to stop the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP); Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP): A creditor loses legal interest to appeal a court order stopping enforcement proceedings if they subsequently withdraw the enforcement request, rendering the appeal inadmissible under ZPP 358(3).

Keywords

AI generated
legal interest in appeal withdrawal of enforcement request stopping enforcement proceedings inadmissible appeal enforcement procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
32. člen Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP)
3. odstavek 358. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
14. člen ZIP
15. člen ZIZ
367. člen ZPP
381. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSC Sklep I Ip 30/2023
Appeal dismissed because debtor lacks legal interest after first instance suspended enforcement due to debt repayment.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1488/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance costs allocation based on child's best interest in family proceedings.
VSL sklep I Ip 1557/2009
Appeal allowed; execution court must hear both parties and cannot admit new evidence after objection.
VSL sklep III Cp 1893/99
Appeal dismissed; agreement on property purchase validly substituted alimony obligation despite coercion claim.
VSL Sklep I Ip 1108/2019
Appeal dismissed; notice of debt transfer to child support fund valid, but debtor must notify new creditor to stop liability.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Upnik nima več pravnega interesa za pritožbo zoper sklep o ustavitvi izvršilnega postopka, če je po izdaji takega sklepa in po vloženi pritožbi umaknil izvršilni predlog. Tako pritožbo se zato zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Prvostopno sodišče je s sklepom ustavilo izvršilni postopek v izvršilni zadevi, ker je ugotovilo, da je dolžnica dolg tekom postopka v celoti poravnala.

Zoper ta sklep se je pritožila upnica s trditvijo, da dolžnica dejansko dolga še ni poravnala.

Tekom pritožbenega postopka pa je upnica po pooblaščencu z vlogo z dne ... izjavila, da v celoti "umika izvršbo", ker je dolžnica svojo terjatev poravnala.

Po 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku - ZIP (sedaj 43. čl. Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju - ZIZ) lahko upnik med postopkom brez dolžnikove privolitve umakne predlog za izvršbo in v takem primeru sodišče postopek ustavi. Ker pa je v obravnavanem primeru predmet izpodbijanja prav sklep sodišča prve stopnje o ustavitvi postopka in ker je upnica umaknila predlog za izvršbo, ne pa pritožbo, pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da upnica za obravnavanje pritožbe zoper sklep o ustavitvi postopka nima pravnega interesa. Taka pritožba se po 3. odst. 358. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) v zvezi s 14. čl. ZIP oziroma 15. čl. ZIZ šteje za nedovoljeno, zato jo je pritožbeno sodišče zavrglo (367. čl. ZPP v zvezi s 381. čl. ZPP in 14. čl. ZIP).