Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 80/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.80.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding application of Articles 86, 87, 88, and 140 of the Obligations Act.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 80/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the second-instance judgment concerning specific provisions of the Obligations Act. The lower courts had declared a share transfer agreement void regarding a share price exceeding 27,057.00 SIT and ordered the defendant to pay damages and costs. The court permitted the review because the first-instance court's findings on the applicability of Articles 86, 87, 88, and 140 of the Obligations Act were not sufficiently substantiated to preclude a review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 86, 87, 88, and 140 of the Obligations Act; A review is admissible when the first-instance court's findings on the application of these provisions are not sufficiently substantiated to preclude a review.

Keywords

AI generated
Obligations Act share transfer agreement void contract share price valuation review admissibility second instance judgment legal substantiation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 86 of the Obligations Act
Article 87 of the Obligations Act
Article 88 of the Obligations Act
Article 140 of the Obligations Act
Paragraph 1 of Article 367.a of the Act on Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II DoR 528/2011
Supreme Court allows review of contract law application regarding unequal bargaining power and unjust enrichment.
AI generated
VSL sodba III Cp 1052/2016
Appeal dismissed; specific injury consequences matter more than Fischer classification for damages adequacy.
VSL Sodba II Cp 473/2024
Insurance company liable for needle injury due to failure to ensure workplace safety under ZVZD.
VSL sodba I Cpg 501/2015
Court allows appeal on VAT rate application and dismisses claim regarding bad faith negotiations burden.
VSL sodba II Cp 2158/2013
Court partially allows worker's compensation claim, reducing employer liability by 10% for worker's contributory negligence.
VSC sodba in sklep Cpg 35/2013
Appeal dismissed for partial costs ruling; appeal against fee waiver order rejected due to procedural defects.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede uporabe 86., 87., 88. in 140. člena OZ.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede uporabe 86., 87., 88. in 140. člena OZ.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugotovilo, da je Pogodba o prenosu delnic Zavarovalnice d.d. z dne 5. 10. 2007, sklenjena med pravdnima strankama, nična oziroma brez učinka v delu, v katerem določa ceno za nakup delnic Zavarovalnice za ceno, ki je višja kot 27.057,00 SIT. Toženi stranki je naložilo plačilo zneska 117.122,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 7. 10. 2010 in plačilo pravdnih stroškov tožeče stranke.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je izpodbijano sodbo spremenilo in primarni tožbeni zahtevek (za ugotovitev ničnosti in vračilo preplačanega zneska) zavrnilo. Tožeči stranki je naložilo plačilo stroškov.

3. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, zato je revizijo glede tega vprašanja dopustilo (enako vprašanje je Vrhovno sodišče dopustilo s sklepom II DoR 528/2011 z dne 24. 5. 2012).