Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS popravni sklep II Ips 277/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:POPRAVNI.II.IPS.277.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in a judgment regarding the amount of legal costs awarded.

Case Number VSRS popravni sklep II Ips 277/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia issued a corrective order to amend a previous judgment that erroneously listed legal costs at 16,958.00 EUR. The plaintiff argued the correct amount was 1,695.80 EUR, which the court verified by recalculating the fees for the response to the appeal. The court ruled that an obvious clerical error occurred during the writing of the costs and exercised its authority to correct the document under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, prvi odstavek 328. člena: The Supreme Court may issue a corrective order to fix obvious clerical errors in judgments regarding the calculation of legal costs.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction legal costs calculation supreme court power procedural law amendment judgment rectification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku, prvi odstavek 328. člena
AI generated
VDSS Sklep Psp 202/2023
Appeal allowed; court reduced lawyer fees by correcting travel time calculation based on hearing location change.
VSM Sklep I Cp 555/2021
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lawyer fee calculation under free legal aid law and cost allocation rules.
VSL Sodba in sklep I Cpg 35/2024
Appeal partially allowed; appeal court quashes first instance judgment for unnotified amendment of claim under ZPP. Appeal court quashes first instance judgment for unnotified claim amendment under ZPP. Appeal court quashes first instance judgment for unnotified claim amendment under ZPP.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1044/2011
Court partially allows appeal on legal fees, rejecting claim of wrong party designation due to res judicata.
VSL sklep I Cp 1988/2010
Appeal dismissed; court rejects separate assessment of claim basis and amount for cost allocation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sodba in sklep Vrhovnega sodišča II Ips 277/2014 z dne 10. 3. 2016 se popravita tako, da se številka 16.958,00 EUR v II. točki izreka in 14. točki obrazložitve odločbe nadomesti s številko 1.695,80 EUR.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da je pri zapisu zneska stroškov revizijskega postopka, ki jih tožnica dolguje tožencu, prišlo do očitne pisne napake, ki jo popravlja s sklepom na podlagi prvega odstavka 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije je z odločbo, navedeno v izreku tega sklepa, zavrnilo revizijo tožnice in jo zavezalo k plačilu toženčevih pravdnih stroškov. Višino njegovih stroškov je zapisalo v znesku 16.958,00 EUR.

2. Tožnica je po izdaji odločbe predlagala njeno popravo v stroškovnem delu, saj je pravilen znesek pravdnih stroškov 1.695,80 EUR, ne pa 16.958,00 EUR.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da je pri zapisu zneska stroškov revizijskega postopka, ki jih tožnica dolguje tožencu, prišlo do očitne pisne napake, ki jo popravlja s sklepom na podlagi prvega odstavka 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku. Seštevek stroškov za odgovor na revizijo (nagrada za postopek za revizijo in pavšal za PTT izdatke, oboje povečano za 22% DDV) znaša 1.695,80 EUR, ne pa 16.958,00 EUR.