Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep VIII Ips 49/2016 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:VIII.IPS.49.2016 AI generated

Supreme Court declares appeal withdrawn based on respondent's signed statement in court settlement.

Case Number VSRS sklep VIII Ips 49/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia declared the appeal withdrawn, ending the proceedings without a substantive ruling on the merits. The appellant had filed an appeal against a final labor law judgment, but later signed a court settlement agreement admitting to withdrawing the appeal. The court applied procedural rules regarding the withdrawal of appeals, noting that once such a withdrawal is made, it cannot be retracted.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 383. člen; 334. člen: A party may withdraw an already filed appeal at any time before the court decides on it, and such withdrawal is irrevocable.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal court settlement agreement labor law dispute irrevocable withdrawal procedural dismissal supreme court review ZPP article 383

Cited Legislation

AI generated
383. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Pdp 71/2020
Appeal dismissed; employer's failure to grant hearing due to employee's leave does not violate termination law.
VSRS Sklep VIII Ips 26/2020
Supreme Court allows appeal, remands case to first instance regarding dismissal legality and salary reduction. Dismissed
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 69/2022-6
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether termination notice period starts upon internal service finding or personal knowledge.
VDSS sodba Pdp 807/2011
Appeal dismissed; one serious breach of work duties justifies immediate contract termination under ZDR.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 466/2018
Appeal dismissed; employer lawfully terminated employee due to genuine business restructuring, not pretextual dismissal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka umaknila revizijo.

[JEDRO]

Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je revizija umaknjena na podlagi podpisane izjave revidenta, podane v sodni poravnavi, da revizijo umika.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev nezakonitosti izredne odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi z dne 30. 1. 2014 in za priznanje vseh pravic iz delovnega razmerja.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožnika zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnik dne 7. 1. 2016 vložil revizijo. Dne 23. 3. 2016 je sodišče prejelo izvod sodne poravnave, sklenjene 16. 3. 2014 pred sodiščem prve stopnje v zadevi I Pd 77/2014. V njej je tožnik podal in podpisal izjavo, da revizijo v zadevi I Pd 244/2014 umika.

4. Na podlagi 383. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in naslednji) veljajo v postopku z revizijo smiselno določbe drugega in tretjega odstavka 334. člena ZPP o umiku pritožbe. V smislu teh določb lahko stranka umakne že vloženo revizijo, dokler sodišče o njej ne odloči. Tak umik revizije se ne more preklicati. Vrhovno sodišče zato s tem sklepom ugotavlja, da je tožeča stranka vloženo revizijo umaknila, kar pomeni, da o njej ne bo odločalo.