Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 2/2016 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:III.DOR.2.2016 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding timing of subcontractor payment obligations under Contract Law Article 631.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 2/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia partially allowed the applicant's request for a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant argued that the lower court incorrectly ignored a bank transfer which should have extinguished the debt owed to the main contractor. The court determined that the conditions for granting a review under the Code of Civil Procedure were met regarding the specific issue of payment timing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review is permitted when the second-instance court fails to address a legal question concerning the timing of performance obligations under Article 631 of the Obligations Act.

Keywords

AI generated
subcontractor payment Obligations Act 631 review admissibility Code of Civil Procedure debt extinguishment bank transfer main contractor

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 631 of the Obligations Act
AI generated
VSL sodba II Cpg 571/2016
Appeal dismissed; small claims court ruling upheld due to procedural bar on appeal grounds.
Sodba III Ips 9/93
Court dismisses appeal claiming inability to pay debt does not extinguish monetary obligation.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 157/2018
Appeal dismissed; court must fix expert report defects sua sponte, not wait for party request.
VSL sklep II Cp 1117/99
Appeal allowed; court remands case to recalculate non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering duration.
VSC Sodba Cp 527/2018
Appeal dismissed; court upheld liability for knee injury as independent trigger of chronic health issues.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Do kdaj lahko naročnik v okviru okoliščin iz 631. člena Obligacijskega zakonika (OZ) veljavno izpolni obveznost plačila glavnemu izvajalcu?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Do kdaj lahko naročnik v okviru okoliščin iz 631. člena Obligacijskega zakonika (OZ) veljavno izpolni obveznost plačila glavnemu izvajalcu?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo plačilo 12.117,50 EUR z zamudnimi obrestmi. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Tožena stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije. Med drugim izpostavlja stališče, da naj bi sodišče druge stopnje neutemeljeno prezrlo, da naj glede na izvedeno nakazilo tožene stranke (naročnice) glavnemu izvajalcu terjatev tožeče stranke (podizvajalke) ne bi obstajala več.

3. Predlog je delno utemeljen.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), zato je revizijo glede tega vprašanja dopustilo.