Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep VIII DoR 4/2016 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:VIII.DOR.4.2016 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to missing final lower court judgment attachment.

Case Number VSRS sklep VIII DoR 4/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to appeal because the final judgment from the second-instance court was not attached to the submission. The applicant submitted a request for review permission on January 8, 2016, but failed to include the required copy of the legally binding decision from the Higher Labour and Social Court dated November 26, 2015. The court rejected the request because Section 367b(3) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law mandates this attachment, and Section 367b(6) provides for the automatic rejection of non-compliant requests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 367b(3) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law; Section 367b(6) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law: A request for permission to appeal is rejected if the applicant fails to attach the final judgment of the second-instance court as required by law.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal civil procedure law missing document attachment rejection of request second instance judgment procedural compliance supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 367b(3) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law (ZPP)
Section 367b(6) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sklep DoR SRG 1/2026
Supreme Court dismisses lay review application due to applicant's failure to prove bar exam qualification.
Sklep II DoR 94/2011
Supreme Court rejects review request as compensation aligns with established judicial practice regarding non-property damage.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 260/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request because applicant failed to prove they hold a legal qualification.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 593/2019
Supreme Court dismisses layperson's revision request due to failure to prove legal qualification.
Sklep III DoR 13/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal admissibility request due to missing certified judgment of second instance court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker tožnica predlogu ni priložila pravnomočne sodbe sodišča druge stopnje, ga je Vrhovno sodišče zavrglo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnica je na Vrhovno sodišče dne 8. 1. 2016 vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo Višjega delovnega in socialnega sodišča Pdp 652/2015 z dne 26. 11. 2015, vendar predlogu sodbe ni priložila.

2. Po tretjem odstavku 367b. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS št. 26/99 in naslednji) mora stranka predlogu za dopustitev revizije med drugim priložiti izvod pravnomočne sodbe sodišča druge stopnje. Če stranka ne ravna v skladu s to določbo, se po šestem odstavku 367b. člena ZPP predlog zavrže.

3. Ker tožnica predlogu ni priložila pravnomočne sodbe sodišča druge stopnje, ga je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu s citiranimi določbami ZPP zavrglo.